Posted on 11/12/2001 5:21:13 PM PST by Pokey78
ALTHOUGH the Taliban were prepared to retreat to their ethnic heartland in southern Afghanistan once the going got tough, they badly underestimated American bombing power, the determination of the opposition Northern Alliance and their vast unpopularity among the Afghan population. The result has been a rout rather than a tactical retreat.
Five years ago, the Taliban, mounted in their four-wheel pick-ups, captured Kabul in a three-day lightning strike.
Kabul's defender, Ahmad Shah Massoud, carried out a brilliant night-time retreat from the capital, evacuating the majority of his troops although losing much of his armour and heavy artillery in the process.
The Taliban calculated that they could do the same from Mazar-i-Sharif and other cities in the north once the alliance launched its offensive.
But they underestimated the withering bombardment carried out by American aircraft which first decimated their front lines, then prevented them from assembling at departure points for retreat, and finally harassed them relentlessly as they fled pell-mell.
In fixed positions dug into the mountains, the Taliban could sustain heavy US bombardment, but once in the open they were subject to attacks night and day as US drones with sensors and special forces on the ground marked out Taliban formations.
The Taliban had fought the alliance to a standstill over the past three years. They miscalculated the alliance's new energy and determination and the fact that, in the past two months, they had been bolstered by large quantities of arms and ammunition from their external supporters.
That determination can be judged by the fact that, with US air cover, the alliance sensed victory and their troops in Taloqan and Kunduz were willing to walk through minefields to reach Taliban defences. In some areas, mines rather than bullets appear to have created the largest number of casualties among alliance troops over the past four days.
But the Taliban's biggest fear was uprisings in the major cities from civilian populations who loathed their repressive government and viewed them as alien occupiers from the south who had no representation from their own minority ethnic groups.
Lacking all support from the population, the Taliban were unable to hide from the bombing by dispersing their troops among civilians, as they have done in the south.
Alliance commanders were able to receive intelligence reports from cities on Taliban positions given to them by friendly civilians. Taliban intelligence among the alliance troop deployments was virtually zero.
The means for the Taliban leaders to communicate in the field with their commanders around the country had become severely limited by the bombing which targeted emissions from satellite telephones or radios.
The lack of military co-ordination between the commanders and the inability of the leaders in Kandahar to communicate a strategy to their generals created confusion, panic and unease.
Thousands of Taliban troops have been trapped in the north due to the rapid advances by the alliance. Those who have escaped are making their way south to the Pathan heartland.
But along the way they face a totally hostile population and in some regions of the south they cannot now even trust their own Pathans.
Nevertheless, the Taliban still control southern and eastern Afghanistan and the long porous border with Pakistan where supplies of food and ammunition are still reaching them, while Pakistani fighters are still willing to cross over and fight for them.
The south is alien to the alliance and the domino effect of falling cities that took place in the north may not last long even if Kabul capitulates. Just a few miles out of the multi-ethnic capital, there are only the heavily armed Pathan tribes, among whom the alliance has no supporters.
The Taliban have many strengths to exploit. They have already dispersed their forces in southern Afghanistan in small towns and villages to avoid the bombing.
They will hold out in these positions awaiting what they expect will be a ground attack by American forces, even though that is highly unlikely due to the reluctance of Washington.
This means that America has to throw its weight behind anti-Taliban Pathan commanders in the south, such as Hamid Karzai. America also has to pressurise Pakistan to accept the new reality given that Islamabad has failed to deliver on its promise to create defections within the Taliban and bring out so-called moderates.
As fast as they have moved on the military front, the alliance have until now, just as swiftly, set up an administration in the cities that they have conquered to prevent revenge and inter-ethnic killings, and provide security so that UN-led humanitarian relief can reach the population. That is going to prove much more difficult than the military campaign.
Too late. And TFB. The meat grinder is wending its way through the ridges and valleys of Hindi Kush. This is not the Khyber Rifles, and British colonial officers who always wanted to be seen as "playing fair".
For America, this is not business as usual any longer, this is personal.
Same thing as during the Gulf War. My boss was at Khe Sanh. He predicted that the Republican Guard would crack as soon as the ground war started, due to the B-52 strikes. He also predicted that the Taliban front lines would crack for the same reason.
The difference between him and Molly Ivins/various pundits/ex-generals? He spent a couple months near B-52 strikes, so he knows firsthand how terrifying the B-52 strikes could be even when they were on his side. Imagine what it's like to spend weeks as the *target* of B-52 strikes. Always talk to those who actually experienced what we're doing, not those who are only guessing.
Seems to me that we could have just dropped a couple of nukes, accept their unconditional surrender, clean up the bombed cities, give them a treaty saying we will take care of their defense in perpetuity, rack up a lopsided trade deficit, and have raw-camel meat bars sprout up stateside, and still come out ahead. ;)
Doesn't sound very free to impose a government upon a soverign nation does it?
Why can't they say The USA?
It's not like a big secret.
Gee, you blow up about 5,000 innocent people, destroy two major building and attacked our homeland
You got our attention: How's it feel?
You said "Try that in a country where the civilian population is armed. Second Amendment Bump."
Excellent point bump!
There is a no-win situation in Afganistan for the US with the exception that we maintain focus about cutting the throats of bin laden, et al."
You act as though this is a bad thing. Our mission in Afghanistan, as previously stated, was clear:
1. Eliminate the Taliban.
2. Bring bin Laden to justice.
... That's it. After that, we go on to the next sanctuary of Al-Quaeda whereverso we may find them.
We'll mop up soon enough. Let the Afghanis control Afghanistan. Out there, due process is a bullet. Everyone knows the rules in Afghanistan. We should elect not to play the game.
Get in, pull the old #6 on them, and get OUT.
No matter what, they're going to be left better off than when we found them.
I could never in my life understand how Molly Ivins stays employed at the Fort Worth Startlegram.
She is the worst hack ever to grace the pages of a decent paper.
I used to write (before email) her about once a month just to piss her off and tell her she was ugly and stupid, not in that order, either.
I don't miss her.
It's hogwash. America should go in, strike the snakes that created the atrocity upon the WTC and get out. That area of the world is better left to themselves than any effort on our behalf. It is doomed to failure and *ANY* interference by America further postpones their capability to form their own republic, based upon their own edicts.
We need to punish the folks responsible for this; not meddle into their internal affairs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.