1 posted on
11/11/2001 3:12:41 PM PST by
jern
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
To: jern
I always said that there were more stupid Democrats than Republicans that couldn't figure out how to vote. This was expected.
2 posted on
11/11/2001 3:15:33 PM PST by
elfman2
To: jern
yawn...
3 posted on
11/11/2001 3:15:57 PM PST by
nimc
To: jern
yawn. This is no doubt spun and distorted. Time to move on...
To: jern
I'm shocked.
To: jern
Does Pat Buchanan still has a chance? Go Pat Go!
To: jern
To: jern
notice who counted them... hmm the liberal media....!
To: jern
Yeah ... and history is the Bush president. Some of these whinners will never get it.
10 posted on
11/11/2001 3:18:00 PM PST by
Buckeroo
To: jern
Vote certified, disputed then litigated by Gore, then eventually to USSC.
Alternative scenario ... dispute to US House.
Result either way?
President GW Bush.
11 posted on
11/11/2001 3:18:12 PM PST by
dodger
To: jern
How ridiculous. No one could possibly come up with a legitimate tally after all of those ballots "questionable handling". George W. Bush is our rightful president. This will blow over quickly, thank God. God Bless America
12 posted on
11/11/2001 3:18:32 PM PST by
EmmaPeel
To: jern
Gee, I wonder how they can tell who was supposed to receive the vote when some idiot voted for two people. I'll bet dollars to doughnuts that ALL the overvotes were "counted" for Gore.
15 posted on
11/11/2001 3:19:14 PM PST by
Helix
To: jern
I love recounts. They smell like...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
cheese!
16 posted on
11/11/2001 3:19:28 PM PST by
nimc
To: jern
A few questions:
1. Which side's legal strategy destroyed chances?
2. Which side (or which court for that matter) ever said ANYTHING about counting overvotes?
3. Who does the media think should have been president the last 10 months? It took them that long to get the job done.
4. Will anyone outside of the DNC and Osama Bin Laden find this information important?
Out.
17 posted on
11/11/2001 3:19:38 PM PST by
lowteksh
To: jern
A few questions:
1. Which side's legal strategy destroyed chances?
2. Which side (or which court for that matter) ever said ANYTHING about counting overvotes?
3. Who does the media think should have been president the last 10 months? It took them that long to get the job done.
4. Will anyone outside of the DNC and Osama Bin Laden find this information important?
Out.
19 posted on
11/11/2001 3:19:55 PM PST by
lowteksh
To: jern
I figured one of these days they would figure out a way to count'em in a way that made Gore the winner. I just didn't think it would take this long.
21 posted on
11/11/2001 3:21:38 PM PST by
Outrance
To: jern
The liberal media is going to have a field day tomorrow. What makes the media think that they were qualified to count any votes? Nobody asked them to. They just couldn't stand Bush winning could they. And they hate it even more that he is more popular than ever now. Well hopefully after a week of their stupid polling that they are undoubtedly going to do they will find out that the American people don't really give a dam!
To: jern
GET OVER IT! YOU CAN'T HAVE A RECOUNT THAT TAKES TEN MONTHS. IT WAS A CLOSE CALL AND BUSH WON.
To: jern
Undervotes are illegal ballots.
Overvotes are illegal ballots.
Goodness, you mean if all illegal ballots were counted for Gore instead of for Bush, that the Democrats would have won?! How typically criminal.
Wonder if the disputed military ballots will even get a mention tomorrow?
27 posted on
11/11/2001 3:23:25 PM PST by
Southack
To: jern
December 9th 1941,
Exclusive to the Washington Post.
Sunday's Japanese aircraft carrier sneak attack on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, destroyed much of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, including 8 battleships.
In other news, the just concluded hand recount of spoiled ballots in Florida, shows that Wendell L. Willkie actually received more votes than Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Critics say that Roosevelt now lacks the authority to lead the Nation at war, and that yesterday's "Day of Imfamy" speech is now null and void.
30 posted on
11/11/2001 3:24:45 PM PST by
Yankee
To: jern
Democratic Underworld is exploding with joy. They never once consider re-counting any other part of the country. Those people are so narrowly focused, it makes me ashamed I used to be registered as a Dem (light-years ago, or so it feels right now!). This is a non-story but it will last a few days. I am writing to all the news media now, asking why they don't question Philly, Detriot, New York, Chicago, St. Louis, absentees, everywhere, New Mexico, Wisconsin, Oregon...Hell, why not the entire country?! Under-votes, over-votes, suspect numbers, thrown-out ballots...that's the story of U.S. elections in every county & state! In every election, and the 2000 one maybe more that most.
31 posted on
11/11/2001 3:25:00 PM PST by
BonnieJ
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson