Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-President Clinton resigns from Supreme Court bar rather than fight suspension
AP ^ | 11/9/01 | ANNE GEARAN

Posted on 11/09/2001 11:07:59 AM PST by truthandlife

Former President Clinton asked to resign from the Supreme Court bar Friday, rather than fight suspension or disbarment related to the Paula Jones sexual harassment investigation.

The high court suspended Clinton Oct. 1 as a follow-up to suspension of his law license in his home state of Arkansas. The high court gave Clinton until Friday to say why he should not be permanently barred from appearing before the high court as a lawyer.

Clinton lawyer David Kendall, in a letter to the court clerk, linked Clinton's request to the loss of his Arkansas law license.

On Jan. 19, a day before he left office, Clinton agreed to a 5-year suspension of the license and a $25,000 fine as part of a settlement that ended the Monica Lewinsky investigation. Independent Counsel Robert Ray agreed not to prosecute Clinton after he left office.

The agreement also satisfied the legal effort by the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct to disbar Clinton for giving misleading testimony in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case.

"In order to avoid the burden of litigation for all parties, to achieve an expeditious and definitive resolution, and in acknowledgment that his actions merited censure, former President Clinton agreed to the suspension and fine," Kendall wrote Friday.

The high court could act on Clinton's request as soon as Tuesday.

Supreme Court disbarment typically follows disbarment in lower courts, and is considered final. In a few cases, lawyers who have successfully regained their law licenses in lower courts have successfully won reinstatement at the Supreme Court. Likewise, Clinton could reapply if he regains his law license, in Arkansas or elsewhere, and keeps it blemish-free for three years.

Membership in the Supreme Court bar is largely ceremonial, but is regarded as an honor among lawyers. Membership requires a sponsor who is already a member, and who will vouch for the candidate's qualifications.

Clinton was admitted to the Supreme Court bar in 1977, when he was Arkansas attorney general. Like most lawyers admitted to the high court bar, Clinton has never argued a case before it.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-166 next last
To: Steel and Fire and Stone
Note that Clinton asked to resign. He will be disbarred. The effect of Clinton asking to resign means nothing. In any event, you do not respond to a court action with a mere letter to the clerk of the court.

Clinton is doing nothing but playing a PR game so he can say he can say he resigned and not have to say he was disbarred. It's all about spin. He is disbarred and chose not to fight it. It is a simple as that.

101 posted on 11/09/2001 12:38:04 PM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Clinton found out he was not up against a group of spineless Senators that gave his a pass on impeachment. Beady eyed Daschle and Kay Bailey Hutchison ended up making the impeachment a farce. They are just a guilty as the Clinton's because they closed their eyes to the law breakers.
102 posted on 11/09/2001 12:44:52 PM PST by Texbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
During Clinton's impeachment proceedings, one local talk-show host had shirts printed up with this slogan:

At least
  Nixon
Resigned!

103 posted on 11/09/2001 12:46:18 PM PST by Big Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Maybe there is some small touch of justice in this universe?
104 posted on 11/09/2001 12:47:02 PM PST by Pete53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winodog
Most people here will agree with your assessment.

However, I was speaking of the opinion of history generally.

105 posted on 11/09/2001 12:49:54 PM PST by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Even Al Gore comes out bad when compared with Nixon. Nixon wouldn't challenge his close election.
106 posted on 11/09/2001 12:50:01 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TheMole
In five years (actually a little over 4) he will once again apply to the Arkansas bar or he will apply to the NY bar.

Some time after that, he will reapply to the SCOTUS bar, hoping that by then people will have forgotten or at least not care.

107 posted on 11/09/2001 12:57:05 PM PST by GEC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Peter W. Kessler
Peter, you must learn tolerance! (Good to see ya)
108 posted on 11/09/2001 1:00:40 PM PST by Seeking the truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Not even a weasely little worm like Kendall would try to defend the indefensible before the Supremes.
109 posted on 11/09/2001 1:01:57 PM PST by Darlin'
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peter W. Kessler
Did you mean like a "dung beetle"?
110 posted on 11/09/2001 1:02:29 PM PST by Seeking the truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
Tolerance would be inappropriate at this time.
111 posted on 11/09/2001 1:12:13 PM PST by Peter W. Kessler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
Shoot! Where was this quitter attitude during his impeachment?

Lawyer fee are coming out of his pocket now. Before, we poor slobs that support our govment had to pay.

112 posted on 11/09/2001 1:14:54 PM PST by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dog
GWB compared to CLINTON:

Hefty, Hefty, Hefty! vs Whimpy, Whimpy, Whimpy!

113 posted on 11/09/2001 1:17:46 PM PST by Florida native
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #114 Removed by Moderator

To: Peter W. Kessler
And those are a few of his better qualities!
115 posted on 11/09/2001 1:18:19 PM PST by hang 'em
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
A sweet ending to the week.

Slick has to endure another humiliation.

I feel so sorry for him.

(sarcasm off)

116 posted on 11/09/2001 1:20:28 PM PST by Windshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
He is disbarred and chose not to fight it. It is a simple as that.

He was prolly afraid that after that glowing, read, illuminating, speech he gave at Georgetown, if he tried to fight it, the Court might reconstitute hanging for raw treason.

117 posted on 11/09/2001 1:21:41 PM PST by NixNatAVanG InDaBurgh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
We should worry about Slick. How will he get by now? Live on kindness from strangers in cities where vagrancy laws are not enforced?
118 posted on 11/09/2001 1:23:08 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
CLINTON WILL FOREVER BE DEFINED AS A LIAR!

(among other things)

119 posted on 11/09/2001 1:34:14 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #120 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson