bump
Posted on 11/09/2001 8:37:30 AM PST by Starmaker
What kind of man is this?
He is fastidious about his appearance, his home and his possessions. He wants as much sex as possible and chooses sexual partners mostly on the basis of appearance. He is self-absorbed and doesn´t want emotional involvement or commitment. He thinks a woman would stifle him and children would be a burden.
Does this sound like gay behavior?
It is also the masculine ideal purveyed by Playboy magazine to men since the 1950´s.
At the End of Time, when they open the envelope labeled “What is the essence of manhood?” I suspect it will say: “Looking after women and children. Men act as G-d´s agent by creating and supporting new life. The family is the cellular unit of human life.” However, in 1972, 3 out of 4 male college students got their ideas about masculinity from Playboy, at an incalculable price to themselves, women, children, and society.
The similarity between the Playboy and homosexual ideal is no coincidence. The Kinsey Report (1948) shaped current mainstream attitudes to sex. It championed unfettered sexual expression and became the manifesto of the counterculture and the sexual revolution. It inspired Hugh Hefner to start Playboy in 1953. Essentially it said that aberrant sexual behavior was so common as to be normal. Thanks to psychologist Dr. Judith Reisman, we now know that Alfred Kinsey and the “Kinsey Report” were frauds. Kinsey, a zoologist at the University of Indiana, pretended to be a Conservative family man. In fact, he was a child molester and homosexual pervert who seduced his male students and forced his wife and associates to perform in homemade pornographic films.
Kinsey´s agenda, in Reisman´s words, was “to supplant what he saw as a narrow procreational Judeo Christian era with a promiscuous “anything goes bi/gay pedophile paradise.” (Crafting Gay Children: An Inquiry, p.4) More than 25% of his sample were prostitutes and prison inmates including many sex offenders. Kinsey, who died prematurely of disease associated with excessive masturbation, said 10 per cent of American men were gay when, in fact, only two per cent were. Kinsey and his team of pedophiles abused 2,000 infants and children to prove that they have legitimate sexual needs. Reisman concludes: “America´s growing libidinous pathologies…taught in schools…and reflected in our fine and popular arts, the press, law and public policy largely mirror the documented sexual psychopathologies of the Kinsey team itself.” (Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences)
Hugh Hefner said the Kinsey Report “produced a tremendous sexual awakening, largely because of media attention…I really view Kinsey as the beginning. Certainly the book was very important to me.” With messianic fervor, Playboy took its message of sexual freedom to the American male who, in the 1950´s and 1960´s, still consecrated sex for marriage. But the freedom was illusory. Playboy´s aim, the aim of all pornographers, was to hook men on the glossy fantasy. To do this, they had to prevent them from finding true satisfaction in marriage. In Reisman´s words, “Playboy was the first national magazine to exploit college men´s fears of women and family commitment. Playboy offered itself as a reliable, comforting substitute for monogamous heterosexual love.” (Soft Porn Plays Hardball, p 47)
Thus “sworn enemies,” Playboy and feminists, found common ground in hatred of healthy heterosexuality expressed in the nuclear family. As a result of the (homo)sexual revolution, society now suffers from epidemics of family breakdown, pornography, impotence, child sexual abuse, sadosexual violence, teen pregnancy, a cocktail of STD´s and, of course, AIDS. The birthrate has plummeted by 60% since 1960 and is now below replacement level. But we must not stand in the way of social progress.
Homosexuality is a developmental disorder caused when a male child fails to bond with his father. Psychologist Richard Cohen, in Coming Out Straight: Understanding and Healing Homosexuality (2000) argues persuasively that, by having sex with men, the adult gay is trying to compensate for father-love denied in adolescence. Cohen was a homosexual himself and is now married with three children. He attributes lesbianism to a woman´s reaction to being rebuffed or abused by her father. He has cured hundreds of homosexuals, but is under constant attack for undermining the gay political agenda, (i.e. redefining societal norms.)
Psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover has pointed to another cause of homosexuality. A 1990 survey of 1000 gays shows that an older or more powerful partner physically assaulted 37% of them before the age of 19. (Homosexuality and American Public Life, 1999, p.24). In addition, according to Anne Moir in Why Men Don´t Iron, some men may be “born gay” due to fetal hormone imbalances. They seem to be a minority in a minority.
For many decades, gays were told that they were “sick” and cruelly persecuted. Their solution: convince the world that, in fact, it is heterosexuals who are sick. In 1973, they bullied the American Psychological Association into proclaiming homosexuality normal. Together with feminists (who believe heterosexuality is inherently oppressive) gays began to dismantle all heterosexual institutions: masculinity, femininity, marriage, the family, the boy scouts, sports, the military, the education system and our Judeo Christian heritage.
Using their position in the media, gays and their liberal supporters now largely dictate our cultural sensibility. They are responsible for the childish obsession with pornographic sex that pervades television, music videos and the Internet. This state of arrested human development is characteristic of homosexuals who have difficulty forming fulfilling long-term relationships. With straight women acting like men and vice-versa, we have become like them.
Gay liberation manuals talk about “normalizing” their sexuality and “de-sensitizing” straights by flaunting it. I was livid when I took my 10-year-old son to see Adam Sandler´s Billy Madison and heard one teenage male youth in the film casually ask another: ”Would you rather bone Pamela Anderson or a young Jack Nicholson?” Last week, on TV´s “Will and Grace,” Jack who is gay dons an apron that says “Kiss the cook” pretending he thought the second “o” was a “c”. Just as Communists once conned do-gooders to think radicalism was chic, gays define trendy for gullible liberals today.
Gay and feminist activists think traditional morality was invented to perpetuate an unjust status quo. In fact, morality is the accumulated wisdom of mankind regarding what is healthy and ultimately fulfilling. Perversion is deviation from what is healthy. Heterosexual morality places sex in the context of love and/or marriage because it “humanizes” the sexual appetite. It ensures that the most profound and intimate physical act between two people expresses a commensurate emotional-spiritual bond. This is the only way sex can be truly satisfying for both men and women. It is also healthy for society because it provides for the natural and necessary outcome of love, children.
With Hugh Hefner´s help, Alfred Kinsey detached sex from love and procreation. He reduced it to another physical function like urinating. Homosexuals seem to champion anonymous bathroom sex; some fornicate through a hole in a cubicle wall. Most have 10s-100s of partners each year. In less extreme form, this is the model that heterosexuals have adopted. Recently a social columnist at the National Post enviously described straight couples she knows who have just broken up: “they´re out partying, having the time and the sex, it seems, of their lives.”
In conclusion, the “sexual revolution” was really a triumph of perverse homosexual norms and values. The gay-feminist agenda is to redefine healthy as deviant and vice-versa and they have succeeded. In forty short years, almost all sexual constraints have dissolved and heterosexual society is reeling. The cultural and social breakdown will only get worse. We need a counterrevolution.
The Playboy logo, the bunny head with two big ears, is used as castration symbolism throughout the magazine. The logo is a "father" symbol, used on the cover to give "permission" to the immature little reader to peek insode, and indulge. Hefner has played a little game all these years with that logo. It always appears twice on each cover, one you can easily see, the other is woven into the layout, or "hidden". It is always used as castration symbolism. The inside of the mag is loaded as well, from the bunny pics, to the advertising.
Bugs Bunny always tops his adversaries in some way. He's a smart-assed character who always gets the best of someone. Remember the Bugs cartoon where he runs about with a pair of scissors clipping off men's neckties? Voila!
Sometimes, things are just as they seem. Stupid is, as stupid does! Don’t be stupid!
bump
It's traditional to post a C&C (Coffee & Cats) warning on such statements.
LOL! Wouldn't most teenage boys be dead of this "disease"?
I was told it would only make one go blind.
And, somehow, I suspect that those of us who view commitment as the goal, and not "fun" as the goal, are having a lot more fun and having it a lot more frequently. :)
My bachelor, playboy brother-in-law is trying desparately to grow up in his fifties (much older than my husband), and he is finding that a bit difficult to do this late in life. Funny, he thought he was leading this swinging, exciting life. Ha! What does he have? Memories of one night stands, relationships gone bad, and his favorite porn. Well, at least his favorite babes haven't grown old with him. They are frozen in time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.