Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If New York Is Nuked
NewsMax ^ | November 9, 2001 | Christopher Ruddy

Posted on 11/09/2001 2:18:51 AM PST by MeekOneGOP

If New York Is Nuked

Christopher Ruddy
Friday, Nov. 9, 2001
With all of the talk, some very serious from President Bush, about terrorists getting and using weapons of mass destruction against Americans, one would think the public should be prepared in case such a weapon is used.

This past week, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said emphatically that if the terrorist groups get a nuclear bomb, they will detonate it in New York.

So, let's suppose a suitcase nuke is detonated in Manhattan.

What should the civilians living in and around New York do? Should they flee outside the city? Should they run to their basements?

It's also evident that an ounce of preparation now will do much more than pounds of after-the-fact rescue efforts.

For some strange reason, our government is very reluctant to prepare its citizens for such a calamity, though acknowledging that such a calamity is not only possible, it's probable.

Certainly the best defense against the use of such weapons should take place in intelligence and with our spies infiltrating terrorist networks.

We discovered on Sept. 11, however, that thanks to Bill Clinton, America no longer has any real intelligence about these groups.

The next layer of defense against such an attack is to hold the governments behind these terrorists accountable – but it's not clear that will be the case. Consider how difficult it has been to find the responsible party for the anthrax attacks.

With our "perimeter" defenses weak, it's even more critical that Americans prepare for adequate civil defense. Civil defense is just that: defense prepared by citizens.

Recently I was out on the West Coast and had dinner with Nancy Greene. Nancy, the widow of the late actor Lorne Green, is president of The American Civil Defense Association (TACDA).

TACDA is a great organization that has raised alarm bells about the need for civil defense for decades.

Nancy, a smart lady who has a keen understanding of international affairs and national security, gave me a brief history of civil defense in America.

She said that real interest in civil defense first started with President Kennedy. After his first summit with Khrushchev in 1961, Kennedy was convinced the Russians were planning a nuclear attack on the U.S.

He returned from his summit in a funk and became a hermit for three days.

He then emerged from his silence with a plan. If America was going to survive, and millions of lives were to be saved, we would need a civil defense program.

But Kennedy decided the Pentagon should not be involved. Instead, Kennedy called upon a friend on Madison Avenue to launch an education effort on how citizens could protect themselves in case of such an attack.

The campaign worked, and was prescient as the nuclear tensions rose during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

Since those days, America has let down its guard. We felt protected during the Cold War under an umbrella of nuclear-tipped missiles and a powerful military. Our enemy was definable.

But now, terrorists are not so easily definable and they are not so afraid of retaliation, as the Russians were.

Once again, government and the private sector need to go into partnership to educate citizens on how to create emergency disaster plans for their families.

Extra food and water is a foundation of any planning. But how many American families have more than a week's supply, if that, on hand?

It's also critical for citizens to have access to potassium iodide, necessary to prevent an agonizing death if radioactive iodine gets into the thyroid. But how many people know this? Why doesn't the government have a stockpile of potassium iodide?

Perhaps a start would be for us to to discard Hollywood myths.

A nuclear detonation does not mean the end of the world. The worst effects will likely not be caused by a nuclear blast, but rather by citizens unprepared and unknowledgeable about how to survive such a calamity.

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Homeland/Civil Defense
Bioterrorism
War on Terrorism


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last
To: MeeknMing
GOOD BYE !
41 posted on 11/09/2001 4:53:09 AM PST by chit*chat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
The sad part is that even if NYC were Nuked, our leftist blame America first crowd still would.
Speaking of which, guess who's the latest to "Blame America First?":

Clinton Joins the Blame-America-First Crowd [Major Barf Alert]

42 posted on 11/09/2001 4:55:09 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: chit*chat
GOOD BYE !
Hmm?? I used to hear that a LOT when I was on AOL. I replaced it with AT&T Broadband and the silence is so sweet! ;-)

43 posted on 11/09/2001 4:56:36 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
I'll say it again. We need to start planning a Million American March on Washington for next september 11th demanding the total reorganization of the INS, closing the border, and searching out and deporting the illegal aliens. we need to plan this now before the Leftists start planning a Sept. 11th '02 march on Washington demanding peace or something.
44 posted on 11/09/2001 4:57:45 AM PST by sanantonioalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
If they do nuke the Big Apple can we make sure that that Mark Rich, and all the others pardoned by Clinton, and his wife are at ground zero.
45 posted on 11/09/2001 4:58:47 AM PST by unending thunder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
For some strange reason, our government is very reluctant to prepare its citizens for such a calamity, though acknowledging that such a calamity is not only possible, it's probable.
God is sad that people accept to be brought to the slaughter like silent lambs ....
46 posted on 11/09/2001 5:00:20 AM PST by Milosevic2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
The worst immediate effect of an atomic attack on Manhatttan, apart from the killing of several hundred thousand people and the destruction of property would be its effect on our financial system. Let us up that all these financial institutions have learned to increase their back-up of data. Let us home that in the worst case, that the government has some kind of hard money alternative available, to keep goods and services flowing if at a reduced level.
47 posted on 11/09/2001 5:00:47 AM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewAmsterdam
So bomb Moscow?

You missed the point. I'm not afraid of russia launching a million muscovites at us!

48 posted on 11/09/2001 5:01:31 AM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Why am I getting the sudden urge to watch Gregory Peck in "On the Beach"?


49 posted on 11/09/2001 5:02:10 AM PST by Jethro Tull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
Well,,,no,,,,Duck and Cover wasn't useless.

It did teach me to put my head between my legs and kiss my A$$ goodbye...

50 posted on 11/09/2001 5:04:39 AM PST by Jethro Tull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Gadsden1st
"..., all the babies around the world will die."

And your scientific basis for this totally stupid remark is?

51 posted on 11/09/2001 5:04:57 AM PST by lawdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: unending thunder
Mark Rich and Clinton are vey rare in New York.
52 posted on 11/09/2001 5:05:32 AM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
They were at the top of my list too.
53 posted on 11/09/2001 5:08:42 AM PST by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: BeforeISleep
Other than to Bash President Bush, get hits for your website, why are you here?

He's trawling for site visitors. After looking at his cartoons, I can see why he's so desperate for exposure; the cartoons suck and the artwork is amateurish.

54 posted on 11/09/2001 5:08:56 AM PST by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Peter W. Kessler
I have some powdered water. I just don't know what to add.
55 posted on 11/09/2001 5:11:59 AM PST by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
He's trawling for site visitors.

EggsAckley what I mean! ;-) I like your name.
56 posted on 11/09/2001 5:20:41 AM PST by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

To: Jethro Tull
It did teach me to put my head between my legs and kiss my A$$ goodbye.

ROFLMAO
58 posted on 11/09/2001 5:23:10 AM PST by Fiddlstix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: AdamWeisshaupt
She will infect us

Or the opposite could happen.

59 posted on 11/09/2001 5:26:57 AM PST by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: BeforeISleep
Thanks!
60 posted on 11/09/2001 5:35:25 AM PST by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson