Skip to comments.
Me versus Coalition to Stop Gun Violence
Electronic-mail conversement
| October 2001
| Keith Dilley and Coalition to Stop Gun Violence
Posted on 11/08/2001 7:44:15 PM PST by 2nd_Ammendment_Defender
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Coalition to stop Gun Violence didn't make a second reponse to my last comments to them. I wonder why? I thought it was rather humorous to read the twisted statistics and hatred that this organization has against firearms. I mean, aren't we are all helpless individuals and none of us could possibly possess the intelligence to use a firearm correctly?
It's too bad many people can't see a concealed carry armed citizen enforcing the peace and upholding the law.
To: 2nd_Ammendment_Defender
It's too bad many people can't see a concealed carry armed citizen enforcing the peace and upholding the law. The leaders of CSGV et al. are well aware that widespread firearm ownership and concealed-carry reduce crime. THAT'S WHY THEY OPPOSE THEM. Politicians and celebrities aren't concerned about criminals with guns. They have bodyguards to protect them. What they are afraid of are law-abiding citizens with guns who may realize they don't need all the "protection" the government wants to "offer" them.
BTW, it's interesting to note that the U.S. government deliberately works to make people increasingly dependent upon it, when the war in 1776 was a war for INDEPENDENCE. Unfortunately, too few people realize that the essense of slavery is not the fact that the slave does work for his master, but rather the fact that the slave is dependent upon his master's good will. When one recognizes that, it becomes clear how much freedom has already been lost and how much more is in severe jeopardy.
2
posted on
11/08/2001 7:50:41 PM PST
by
supercat
To: 2nd_Ammendment_Defender
I got the same thing from them.
To: 2nd_Ammendment_Defender
ARRRGH....SOS These libs foster co-dependency under the guise of mutual benefit and shared risk, then bludgeon you when you "cost" them.
4
posted on
11/08/2001 7:57:10 PM PST
by
dasboot
To: 2nd_Ammendment_Defender
About 20 years ago in my town, a basement arsenal was discovered: they were a cache of Revolutionary War rifles.
'Splain me how that had nothing to do with freedom?
I'd never keep my firearms in a basement, though-- too damp.... unless I had no choice, to keep 'em away from these new Redcoats.
5
posted on
11/08/2001 8:04:27 PM PST
by
dasboot
To: 2nd_Ammendment_Defender
What does America gain from tough, restrictive gun laws? 1. Freedom.
Ahem. Calling George Orwell.
2. Safety. Approximately 30,000 Americans are killed with firearms every year and an additional 90,000 are injured with firearms.
Over 2 million people use firearms to defend themselves every year. Take the gun away and you have 2 million more casualties to deal with on top of the 30 thousand a year.
3. Protection
Calling George Orwell. I'm sure the next time a burglar breaks into my home, I'll wave a copy of the Brady law under his nose instead of a gun. Yep, that'll fix your wagon, Mr. Criminal!
6
posted on
11/08/2001 8:05:49 PM PST
by
lowbridge
To: Mercuria; AnnaZ; HangFire
bump
7
posted on
11/08/2001 8:07:10 PM PST
by
lowbridge
To: lowbridge
Calling George Orwell. I'm sure the next time a burglar breaks into my home, I'll wave a copy of the Brady law under his nose instead of a gun. Yep, that'll fix your wagon, Mr. Criminal!
Well Said!
I get so sick of this anti-2nd amendment/anti-gun crap.
8
posted on
11/08/2001 8:12:33 PM PST
by
Fiddlstix
To: lowbridge
3. The Gun Industry is one of the few unregulated industries in America. Every other consumer product -- from teddy bears to toasters -- is subject to stringent safety regulations. Guns are not.Try to buy a handgun in California that hasn't passed the "drop test". These people are incapable of telling the truth!
9
posted on
11/09/2001 7:07:51 AM PST
by
HangFire
To: 2nd_Ammendment_Defender
I thought their reply to you was a joke. It is, isnt it ?
To: HangFire
"3. The Gun Industry is one of the few unregulated industries in America. Every other consumer product -- from teddy bears to toasters -- is subject to stringent safety regulations. Guns are not. " In massachusetts the only guns you can purchase new are Smith and Wessons.
To: HangFire
3. The Gun Industry is one of the few unregulated industries in America. Every other consumer product -- from teddy bears to toasters -- is subject to stringent safety regulations. Guns are not.About once a year they trot out this tired old nag of a shibboleth-- I've heard there are 23,086 guns laws already on the books.... so #23,087 will be the magic law that solves the problem, right?
12
posted on
11/09/2001 7:25:05 AM PST
by
backhoe
To: michaelje; backhoe
It's amazing no matter how many times we correct them, they continue to spew the same tripe! They believe if they say it long enough and loud enough it will somehow become truth...
13
posted on
11/09/2001 8:25:58 AM PST
by
HangFire
To: *bang_list
I was reading through posts with "gun" in the title and found a few that were not on the bang_llist...
14
posted on
11/13/2001 4:47:34 PM PST
by
wxyz
To: 2nd_Ammendment_Defender
It's not illegal for ex-felons or anyone else to own firearms or any other arms, the Brady act and around 20,000 other unconstitutional "gun control" and arms control acts are illegal. There are provisions in the constitution for loss of liberties while incarcerated. If someone is a danger to society, they should remain in jail or be executed.
"A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." - Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
To: lowbridge
I'm sure the next time a burglar breaks into my home, I'll wave a copy of the Brady law under his nose instead of a gun. The ATF regulations concerning firearms, at 300-plus pages, would be a far more effective weapon.
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: 2nd_Ammendment_Defender
Allow me to edit their comments (my corrections in
bold):
"Freedom for criminals is picking your children up at school to molest them and not worrying about their own safety. Freedom for criminals is walking in your neighborhood after dark. Freedom for criminals is not having to worry about gunfire when they come to rape or kill members of your family."
18
posted on
11/16/2001 1:07:29 PM PST
by
Campion
To: lowbridge
Good reply. Have you sent it to these morons yet???
19
posted on
11/18/2001 8:16:19 PM PST
by
dcwusmc
To: dcwusmc
Have you sent it to these morons yet??? Nah, they're not worthy. :-)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson