Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MarkWar; alien2
Personally I think both of you are a little bit paranoid. This is the expression of one photographer, not acting on behalf of anyone but himself and expressing himself in a way that is open to him. There is not media "conspiracy." It's just that they have beent trained from early on to think a certain way so exaggerating numbers at an anti-American rally comes naturally to them.

When I said that the media is telling us not to trust the media, I see absolutely no evidence that this is a conspiracy to polarize people. It's just a little truth sneaking out between the cracks of the wall the media has built around itself. After all, he's "just" a photographer and won't be taken seriously by many people and his opinion won't be heard by many.

97 posted on 11/07/2001 4:45:39 PM PST by Mr. Mulliner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: Singapore_Yank
>Personally I think both of you are a little bit paranoid. ... After all, he's "just" a photographer and won't be taken seriously by many people and his opinion won't be heard by many.

[smiles] "...a little bit paranoid" is a very polite way to describe me. For the most part, I'm a tin foil wacko. But, you know, life is a stew. Crazy people like me balance out the conservative dullards and, possibly, somewhere in between the lurkers who just sit back and laugh at everybody can synthesize something resembling truth...

There are two things I keep in mind about the media: 1) It is layered and selective. The opinion of _anyone_ doesn't just "appear" somewhere. Some editor or producer (of some kind) solicits the opinion and then makes it available in a controlled context. THEN, usually, some other editor or producer (of some kind) selects _that_ and calls attention to it somehow by making it available somewhere else... Usually the "mass market" only sees things after they've been selected through two or three stages like this. It's not random, accidental or emergent at all.

2) The media is built around SPIN -- I believe the phrase was first popularized in the book "The Aquarian Conspiracy" to refer to a kind of social movement that would make the best of all worlds available to its activists. SPIN is generally accepted -- by tin foil types -- to be an acronym for S-egemented P-olycentric I-ntegrated N-etwork. That is, it refers to a group of people who are scattered about and self-organized but united in principle and communicating with each other using various means. This allows for concerted, effective action, but disguises unity of the effort.

(One humorous incident occurred when a professor from Temple University, a Ph.D, wrote a book on UFOs. Among the reviews that attacked the book was a long review in an audiophile magazine specializing in high-end music systems. The author said he expected to get strange reviews, but he never expected hi-fi people to take a stand on UFOs...)

If you look at a rainbow, each individual drop of water is just a drop of water. It's only when you step back and look at the really big picture that you see the pattern of colors. I think the media is something similar. Each individual item is just a media item. It's when you step back and look for bigger patterns that you see the interesting "shapes" and "colors."

But I'm the first person to be upfront about my tin foil leanings.

Mark W.

101 posted on 11/08/2001 6:28:54 AM PST by MarkWar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson