Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vote Earley ( and often)
nationalreview.com/ ^ | 11/05/2001 | By John J. Miller & Ramesh Ponnuru

Posted on 11/05/2001 10:16:14 PM PST by KQQL

Vote Earley
Bush, Giuliani, and Bishop Loverde pitch in.

By John J. Miller & Ramesh Ponnuru
November 5, 2001 11:00 a.m.

Behind in the polls and badly outspent by his opponent, Virginia's GOP candidate for governor brought America's two most popular politicians and an important religious leader into his campaign over the weekend. Mark Earley's campaign mailed a brochure displaying a big picture of Earley walking half a step behind President Bush on what appears to be a tarmac. Inside, there's a quote from Bush: "I appreciate his strong stance on holding the line on taxes and cutting the car tax in Virginia." Bush recorded a phone message on behalf of Earley and two ticket mates, lieutenant governor candidate Jay Katzen and attorney general candidate Jerry Kilgore: "Mark Earley, Jay Katzen and Jerry Kilgore are the experienced leaders Virginia needs to keep the state moving forward--with a positive agenda for lower taxes, accountable schools, more jobs, and a safe and secure commonwealth." Earley's campaign also aired a new ad featuring New York mayor Rudy Giuliani: "If I were a Virginian, I would vote for Mark Earley." Voters who tuned in to the start of the World Series game last night would have seen it.

In northern Virginia, Earley may benefit as well from a letter by Catholic Bishop Paul Loverde that was either read at Masses or inserted into church bulletins over the weekend. In it, Loverde reminds parishioners of their "moral responsibility to vote" on Tuesday. "Respect for the dignity of the human person must be part of our consciousness as we enter the voting booth," continues the two-page letter. It also reminds voters of "the priority to protect the human life of all persons, pre-born and born."

The letter would have been stronger if Loverde had mentioned specifically that Earley is the pro-life candidate in the race and that his opponent, Democrat Mark Warner, supports abortion rights. In other words, there's more than just a moral responsibility to vote; there's a moral responsibility to vote for Mark Earley. Another possibility would have been to attach a scorecard showing how Earley and Warner (plus other candidates down the ticket) differ on abortion. Earley, for instance, supports legislation to require parental consent before a minor may obtain an abortion, while Warner won't commit past the parental-notification law that Earley helped enact.

As things stand, the bishop's letter leaves voters on their own to figure out the candidates' positions by tomorrow's election day. Perhaps they're sophisticated enough to know where Earley and Warner stand. Then again, perhaps not--and they won't receive much help from Earley's campaign website, which focuses on taxes, education, and safety issues.

But it's a good conclusion to what has been a lackluster campaign. In the end, though, the only thing that may salvage the hopes of those who intend to vote Earley is if they somehow manage to vote often.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: earley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-286 next last
To: KQQL
Well, I did the dirty deed. I voted for Earley. Personally, I think he'll lose. A lot of factors will play into it.

I voted Libertarian for the first time in my life. We need to end the WOD. The Lt. Gov. candidate made that a hallmark of his campaign. In fact, this was the first time that I had voted for anyone outside of the Republican Party. I also voted for the local Libertarian Delegate candidate.

161 posted on 11/06/2001 9:57:35 AM PST by TKEman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #162 Removed by Moderator

To: Dane
Well, Dane, for once you and I are in agreement. I voted Libertarian for Lt. Gov., and for Earley in the Gubernatorial race. Happy now?
163 posted on 11/06/2001 9:59:44 AM PST by TKEman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: LibertyGirl77
Or the northern end of the Springfield interchange where 395 passes over 495...close both down going into Alex./Arl.

Hey now, I gotta use that to get home!

164 posted on 11/06/2001 10:00:36 AM PST by sirshackleton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: The Federal Farmer
So you're more than happy to vote for a Republican who won't get substantive tax reform than vote for a Libertarian who will?

Psst, the Libertarian won't win. Under warner you are going to get a tax hike, no matter what and again Mark Warner wants to say thank you for your vote.

165 posted on 11/06/2001 10:00:41 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: The Federal Farmer; Dane
If a Republican governor will cut taxes, why are you asking for tax cuts after two terms under GOP control?

George Allen tried to cut taxes but was stopped by the RAT controlled General Assembly. (He accomplished everything else he promised).

Jim Gilmore cut the car tax and also signed the legislation eliminating sales tax on over the counter medications.

As far as I'm concerned, the response to EVERY tax cut should be "Thank you sir. May I have another?"

166 posted on 11/06/2001 10:00:41 AM PST by Ward Smythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

Comment #167 Removed by Moderator

To: IMRight
I saw someone hand back the sample ballot to the Warner rep saying "Warner is the democrat???". I think having the "R" and "D" placed next to the candidates names helps us a lot more than we think in this election.

This is something I'd wondered about. John Warner is fairly popular, I think, and I'm sure there's lots of confusion that might be fixed when people finally see the party affiliations. Mark Warner always disguised the fact that he's a Dem.

168 posted on 11/06/2001 10:02:06 AM PST by The Old Hoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: mrs9x
Does anyone know when the polls close in VA and NJ?

Don't know about NJ, but the Virginia polls close at 7 PM.

169 posted on 11/06/2001 10:02:16 AM PST by the bottle let me down
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: The Federal Farmer
Just like Jesse Ventura couldn't win?

Of course he won't win if you don't vote for him.

Uh at least jesse ventura had experience as a politician. He was a mayor. Also he had name recognition from a culture that goes ga-ga over staged wrestling.

170 posted on 11/06/2001 10:04:18 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: sirshackleton
I have to use it too, but like I said--I'll spend the night if it means a Warner loss.
171 posted on 11/06/2001 10:05:37 AM PST by LibertyGirl77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: The Federal Farmer
Oh BTW, Mark Warner thanks you for your vote.
172 posted on 11/06/2001 10:06:14 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

Comment #173 Removed by Moderator

Comment #174 Removed by Moderator

My opinion: Early does not deserve to win. My observations: Poor representation. Poor organization. Lack of contact with the public. Inferior coordination and utilization of volunteers. (for ex. no-one at polling places except socialist Warner cronies) I have not voted yet, need to go by after work. Dark day for Virginia. I am sad.
175 posted on 11/06/2001 10:07:47 AM PST by Menmy38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: The Federal Farmer
"I feel much better voting for Redpath and Reams..."

I looked into Redpath, but he appeared to be to the Left of the GOP candidate...Reams seems like a good guy, but he seems waaay to caught up with the Reeferendum Issue at the expense of some much more pressing issues. Personally, I'm more than a bit soured on the Libertarian Party due to Harry Browne's anti-American--MHO--comments following 9/11. I'm libertarian by political philosophy, but I'm beginning to think the Libertarian Party's got a tone-deaf political ear.

FReegards...MUD

176 posted on 11/06/2001 10:08:55 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: The Federal Farmer
But people voted for a third party candidate because he offered something the Republican-Democrat duo didn't -- a real alternative.

jesse ventura got elected because of young voters who thought it would be cool.

Jesse is just your run of the mill liberal politician.

177 posted on 11/06/2001 10:09:16 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: The Federal Farmer
And all the useless government workers who will still have jobs and suck tax money under a Republican governor thank you

And that great big sucking sound of tax dollars going out of taxpayers pockets is going to grow under warner.

Again mark warner thanks you for your vote.

178 posted on 11/06/2001 10:11:50 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

Comment #179 Removed by Moderator

To: The Federal Farmer
You heard a lot of the same rhetoric in 1776. Fewer than one-third of the colonists supported independence,

Get 33% in the polls, and then the Libertarians will present an option to consider. Below 30%, and all you can do is make sure the leftist candidates win.

180 posted on 11/06/2001 10:13:25 AM PST by putupon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-286 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson