Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Uses Huge Bomb Against Taliban Forces
Associated Press ^ | November 5, 2001 | staff

Posted on 11/05/2001 5:47:46 PM PST by Lady In Blue

Nov 5, 2001

U.S. Uses Huge Bomb Against Taliban Forces

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) - With its use of the 15,000-pound "daisy cutter" bomb in Afghanistan, the United States has unleashed one of its most powerful weapons - billed as the world's largest conventional bomb.

The BLU-82 combines a watery mixture of ammonium nitrate and aluminum with air, then ignites the mist for a huge explosion that incinerates everything within up to 600 yards. The shock wave can be felt miles away.

The BLU-82 uses about six times the amount of ammonium nitrate explosive that Timothy McVeigh used in the bomb that blew up the Oklahoma City federal building in 1995.

First created during the Vietnam War to quickly clear jungle landing zones, the daisy cutter also was used against Iraqi troops during the Gulf War. Reports from the ground in Afghanistan indicate the huge bombs have been used against front-line Taliban positions.

The bombs cost about $27,000 each. They are dropped from a C-130 cargo plane flying at least 6,000 feet off the ground, to avoid the bomb's massive shock wave. Each is more than 17 feet long and 5 feet in diameter - about the size of a Volkswagen Beetle but far heavier.

AP-ES-11-05-01 2047EST

This story can be found at : http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGA6ASS1PTC.html


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: daisycutter; oef; taliban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261 next last
To: Lady In Blue
I like that big bomb. Keep 'em flying till the bad guys aren't there anymore.
121 posted on 11/05/2001 7:15:23 PM PST by SEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boston Capitalist
I am presuming they are "unguided". What kind of accuracy can they get from 30,000 feet? Pushed out the back of a cargo plane at fairly low altitude....

Also explains why they wern't used before...as need to make shure all ground to air is adequately supressed.

Those cargo planes are slow flying and vunerable

Hopefully the fuel air bombs will be demonstrated next...

122 posted on 11/05/2001 7:17:57 PM PST by spokeshave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
Excellent link, cynwoody! Thanks!
123 posted on 11/05/2001 7:18:09 PM PST by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Kalashnikov_68
Re: Post 43

Does it come in any other colors?

124 posted on 11/05/2001 7:23:45 PM PST by Tornado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: HoustonCurmudgeon

"http://pages.prodigy.net/dsbrittain/KSEV%20700%20AM%20Radio2.htm"
this is the only link i can find that works for ksev...
n its n ad for one of their new sponsors

125 posted on 11/05/2001 7:23:51 PM PST by hoot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue
The BLU-82 uses about six times the amount of ammonium nitrate explosive that Timothy McVeigh used

This interesting, since the explosive weight of the BLU-82 is about 13,000 pounds. Some of that is aluminum powder, but ignoring that (and I suspect that's a large amount being ignored) you get 2,167 pounds of ammonium nitrate for Timmy to have used. I thought the latter numbers for his bomb were in the 7000 pound range?

Notice how AP can't resist bringing in the OKC bombing even though there is no apparent reason to do so, in this article that is.

126 posted on 11/05/2001 7:25:14 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
U.S. Uses Huge Bomb Against Taliban Forces 

a 62 Caddy de Ville.

pull a mcnamara, drop edsel's on em....
talkin' about a bomb

127 posted on 11/05/2001 7:26:11 PM PST by hoot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Hillary 666
How would you like to see that monstrosity on a parachute coming at you? Wow!!

Ah, no one's survived to pass that info on.:^|

128 posted on 11/05/2001 7:26:31 PM PST by Kermit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: GuillermoX
"Yeah, but do the Muslims across the world approve??"

Good thinking. It's important to be PC on these things. I hope we didn't offend the people who were dancing in the streets on the night of 9/11. They have feelings too, you know.

129 posted on 11/05/2001 7:27:33 PM PST by Paulie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #130 Removed by Moderator

To: sonofliberty2
As I advocated and predicted, the US has used its first vacuum bomb in Afghanistan. This bomb has the equivalent explosive power to .03KT--not quite micronuke range, but still an awesome weapon well suited for usage against the Taleban cave-dwellers.
131 posted on 11/05/2001 7:33:32 PM PST by rightwing2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue
The shock wave goes into the cave and kills all inside.
132 posted on 11/05/2001 7:33:52 PM PST by Frankiedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oyez
I wonder if iron oxide added the the ammonium nitrate-aluminum mix would give it a thermite effect.

I was thinking of the same thing, and it may already have some iron in the mixture, but the iron acts only as a catalyst.

The propellant mixture in solid rocket fuel such as used on the Shuttle SRB motor consists of an ammonium perchlorate (oxidizer, 69.6 percent by weight), aluminum (fuel, 16 percent), iron oxide (a catalyst, 0.4 percent), a polymer (a binder that holds the mixture together, 12.04 percent), and an epoxy curing agent (1.96 percent), which is extremely flammable.

In fact the Hindenburg burned so strongly because the skin was a mixture or iron oxide and a heavy dose of aluminum powder, not because of the hydrogen.

This bomb is effectively solid rocket propellant allowed to ignite all at once.

133 posted on 11/05/2001 7:37:33 PM PST by HighWheeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue
Good news to me and a great bargain at only $27,000 per. I heard a radio report to day that said they're dropped with a parachute to slow it's descent enough to allow the plane dropping it to get the hell out of the way. A couple of days of these dropped on the Taliban front lines and there won't be any Taliban front lines!
134 posted on 11/05/2001 7:38:39 PM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oyez
You know, burn a hole half way to China.

Wrong direction, if one is starting from Afgoneistan, China is just over the moutains to the east. Have to burn nearly horizontally to come out in China. Go straight down and you'd come out somewhere south and west of Easter Island in the South Pacific.

135 posted on 11/05/2001 7:39:51 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue

136 posted on 11/05/2001 7:40:54 PM PST by It'salmosttolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobinIL
Just dress them and make bombs out of the dummies and parachute them all over the place. Let them know in advance so they can get ready and then......kaboom!
137 posted on 11/05/2001 7:41:42 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue
The bombs cost about $27,000 each. They are dropped from a C-130 cargo plane flying at least 6,000 feet off the ground, to avoid the bomb's massive shock wave. Each is more than 17 feet long and 5 feet in diameter - about the size of a Volkswagen Beetle but far heavier.

Indeed that sounds like the main course--but a squadron of A-10 Warthogs might serve up some pretty hot side dishes to the jihaders in the mountains and valleys once we lock up those airfields in Tajikistan.


138 posted on 11/05/2001 7:42:31 PM PST by henbane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kermit
Ah, no one's survived to pass that info on.:^|

I'll buy that. Better have your life insurance paid up!

139 posted on 11/05/2001 7:45:03 PM PST by Hillary 666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
I was just being literal. I don't really care where the other end of the hole winds up, I'd just like to see them try it.
140 posted on 11/05/2001 7:46:05 PM PST by oyez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson