Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aristeides
It's meant to be obviously a spurious document.

That's my reading too. IMO, the first paragraph makes it abundantly clear:

It is October 27, 2001. . . or today. You are the a Senior Assistant to the President, or perhaps the Chairman of Citigroup, or perhaps the publisher of the Chicago Tribune, or perhaps the President of RAND. Or perhaps you are yourself. One of your closest friends—someone whose judgment and integrity are beyond question—calls and asks urgently for a private meeting at once. When you meet, he presents you with the following document, which he had personally received a few hours earlier from an utterly reliable colleague in the Pentagon. (This source is also the author of the introductory note in italics, wherein he refers to himself in the third person.) Your friend is in a state of great alarm. He is certain that the document is authentic.

58 posted on 11/04/2001 7:46:09 PM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: dighton
Right, this is a "what if" senario written as fiction, not fact. It is chilling, but fiction all the same. That paragraph was probably not read, or just skimmed over by many reading this.
106 posted on 11/04/2001 9:34:37 PM PST by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson