Skip to comments.
Terrorists Attacked Gun Control Movement
Fox News ^
| 11/4/01
| Glenn Harlan Reynolds
Posted on 11/04/2001 9:07:21 AM PST by jimkress
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:31:31 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
"I think all women oughta carry a cell phone and a three-fifty-seven. Loaded."
So declares a woman interviewed by The New Republic's Michelle Cottle.
That statement seems to sum up the post-Sept. 11 attitude toward gun control. Things were already tough for the gun-control movement. Convinced that Al Gore's strong anti-gun stance had cost the Democratic Party the 2000 election, the Democratic Leadership Council
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Front Page News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Properly understood, the gun control movement has always rested on certain essentially religious notions (indeed, though it is little publicized, much of the gun-control movements financial and institutional support comes from non-evangelical Protestant denominations). These notions are that violence even against a criminal is always bad, that ordinary people are not to be trusted, and that it is best to let the authorities look out for you. In addition, the movement has always contained a rather strong undercurrent of hostility toward traditional American standards of masculinity, of which it sees the gun as a symbol.
It is here that things seem to have changed the most. Americans have learned that being harmless does not guarantee that they will not be harmed: in fact, it seems that terrorists (like ordinary criminals) actually prefer victims who cannot strike back.
Finally! The lie of Liberalism is exposed!
1
posted on
11/04/2001 9:07:21 AM PST
by
jimkress
To: *bang_list
FYI
2
posted on
11/04/2001 9:08:07 AM PST
by
jimkress
To: jimkress
Great article. Thanks for posting.
3
posted on
11/04/2001 9:26:37 AM PST
by
Apollo
To: jimkress
previously posted, but bump for wider circulation
BANG!
To: jimkress
Thank you for that great article! THE lie of liberalism? heheh.. just one of many that are being exposed these days, my friend. Liberalism is a religion based completely on lies.
5
posted on
11/04/2001 9:34:09 AM PST
by
goodieD
To: goodieD
BUMP!
6
posted on
11/04/2001 9:34:41 AM PST
by
goodieD
To: jimkress
What I can't undestand is why it took 9-11 to change the minds of so many people concerning the harm of gun control. As a married female licensed to carry concealed, I have been trying desperately to make other females understand that the
ONLY equalizer for a female against an attack from a male is a loaded gun used with proper defense training.
Women have been attacked, beaten and raped for centuries. Since 9-11 though, I have met with far less resistance to the notion that women should be armed than prior to that tragic date.
Go figure.
7
posted on
11/04/2001 9:34:55 AM PST
by
dansangel
To: jimkress
Properly understood, the gun control movement has always rested on certain essentially religious notions (indeed, though it is little publicized, much of the gun-control movements financial and institutional support comes from non-evangelical Protestant denominations). These notions are that violence even against a criminal is always bad... Would that be these Protestant denominations?
To: jimkress
Excellent article.
It is also more and more apparent by the day that it is important for all Americans to demand the full restoration of the 2A. Start with Brady etal, and then go back to the original sin, GCA '68.
Until then, for those who have the unfortunate position of living in the People's Republics here within the US, remember "It's better to be judged by 12 than be carried by 6"
A big 2A bump for this one.
Keep the Faith for Freedom
MAY GOD BLESS AND PROTECT THIS HONORABLE REPUBLIC
Greg
9
posted on
11/04/2001 9:41:02 AM PST
by
gwmoore
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: OldWhig
I'd like to know how to access the "Bang List" directly Type "to:bang_list" in the search box and you're off to the races.
To: RogueIsland
And once again, with a paragraph tag this time.
I'd like to know how to access the "Bang List" directly
Type "to:bang_list" in the search box and you're off to the races.
To: Jolly Rodgers
I'd like some more detail about Protestant involvement with the gun control movement. The link you supplied talked about an appeal to stop the bombing. That's different. If you look around, Protestants are not the ones against guns. It is largely the immigrants and the recently-foreign. Jews are against guns, at least for the population at large. Catholics are against guns - the Irish especially - look no further than the Bradys and Rosie O'Donnell. Their fellow-Catholics do nothing to help them reform. And let's be frank. They didn't come here to build a great nation. The great nation was already built. They came to suck the money. The list goes on. Muslims are against guns - guns in the hands of Americans will keep them from achieving their goals. So a little clarificiation would be helpful. And Protestants in the State of Washington on a subject other than gun control falls short of constituting clarification.
To: henderson field
Hmmmm.....Interesting. I'm Catholic and pro-gun (see post #7 above). Just what "category" does that put me in?
To: henderson field
And Protestants in the State of Washington on a subject other than gun control falls short of constituting clarification. The connection, and reason why I posted the link, is self defense.
To: jimkress
BUMP. I just thanked the author for writing this. It's excellent.
To: Jaded
Bump
To: henderson field
One more comment...as to "Jews" being "against guns", I suggest you visit the following site:
Jews For The Preservation Of Firearms
I guess that just leaves Muslims. Unfortunately, I don't have any information......can anyone help?
To: Jolly Rodgers
Thanks for the link! I think you're 100% correct. I firmly believe the premise that the pro-UN churches are definitely behind the gun control movement.
To: dansangel
I'm Catholic and pro-gun (see post #7 above). Just what "category" does that put me in? Disavowed, maybe!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson