Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Sets Up Plan to Fight Smallpox in Case of Attack
New York Times ^ | November 4, 2001 | LAWRENCE K. ALTMAN

Posted on 11/03/2001 2:49:26 PM PST by samtheman

ATLANTA, Nov. 3 — The government has begun taking steps to cope with the possibility of a terrorist attack involving smallpox by training doctors to recognize the disease and by vaccinating small teams of experts who would rush to any part of the country to contain and treat a suspected outbreak.

Officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which is taking the steps, say they have no evidence that anyone is readying a terrorist attack using smallpox, a disease that was eradicated worldwide 21 years ago. But they say smallpox is so deadly that it is important to prepare for any attack.

The smallpox virus is known to exist only in laboratories in the United States and Russia. But germ warfare experts suspect that other countries, including North Korea and Iraq, may have secretly obtained stocks. It is greatly feared as a weapon because it is contagious and has a high death rate. And much of the world's population is susceptible.

Last week, the disease centers vaccinated about 140 members of epidemiologic teams that can be summoned at a moment's notice to examine a suspected case anywhere in the country.

This week, the centers will begin a series of training courses in smallpox for certain of its own employees and state and local health workers. Additional courses will be held over the next several weeks at the federal agency's headquarters here.

The vaccinations and course are part of a broader effort by health officials to respond quickly to any new bioterrorism threats that might follow the recent deliberate spread of anthrax through the mail.

"Our concerns are not limited to anthrax," said Dr. James M. Hughes, who directs the federal agency's center for infectious diseases. Those concerns include diseases like botulism, plague, tularemia and smallpox.

Smallpox is of particular concern because of its potential to spread quickly. In a military exercise this past summer called Dark Winter, researchers conducted a simulated smallpox attack on Oklahoma City. The epidemic quickly soared out of control, spreading to 25 states and millions of people.

Tens of millions of Americans under the age of 30 are susceptible to smallpox because they were never vaccinated; the United States stopped smallpox immunizations in 1972. Tens of millions of older people who were vaccinated decades ago are thought to have decreased protection because the vaccine may have worn off.

Another major concern is that generations of American doctors have never seen a case of smallpox. The only ones who have are a few hundred doctors who participated in the World Health Organization's smallpox eradication program decades ago.

Smallpox patients are usually quite sick. The infection is characterized by a rash and a fever of at least 102 degrees. The rash and symptoms begin to develop 11 or 12 days after a person is exposed to the virus. The characteristic lesions can occur anywhere on the body, but they usually appear on the face first, and they tend to appear more on the arms and legs and less on the chest, abdomen and back. Palms and soles are favorite areas. The earliest lesions tend to appear as raised bumps that often contain fluid. Over a period that can last as long as 19 days, the lesions become firm, filled with pus, and then form scabs. The illness can leave its victims blind and scarred.

Smallpox can be confused with chickenpox. In making the diagnosis, a doctor touches the skin. Smallpox lesions tend to feel as if they are deep in the skin, in contrast to the lesions of chickenpox, which feel superficial. Chickenpox itches; smallpox lesions can be very painful.

But because the earliest stage of smallpox can resemble rashes caused by many other diseases besides chickenpox, identification can be difficult without laboratory tests.

Since smallpox was eradicated, the centers have sent epidemiologists to investigate suspect illnesses a few times a year. Dr. Hughes said that the centers had already dispatched smallpox experts on short notice three times in the last month to evaluate specific cases.

None of the patients had smallpox. Instead, they had problems like allergic rashes or shingles, an illness in adults that is caused by the same virus that caused chickenpox early in life.

Dr. Jeffrey P. Koplan, the director of the disease centers, said that his agency expected false alarms as a necessary part of the efforts to encourage doctors to heighten their suspicion of anthrax, smallpox and other so-called exotic diseases.

Dr. Koplan likened the extra caution to programs that encourage patients with chest pain to seek medical attention to determine if they are having heart attacks. Many patients who are admitted to coronary care units turn out not to have had heart attacks.

Even doctors who have seen smallpox cases have been wrong. Doctors at the disease centers misdiagnosed a case of chickenpox as smallpox in Washington in the mid-1960's. And earlier this year, epidemiologists at the centers responded to a call from health officials in a Central American country where a missionary doctor who had seen smallpox became suspicious about several cases of rash and fever in a remote village. But the rash turned out to be from something else.

Dr. Stanley O. Foster and Dr. J. Michael Lane, two former disease centers employees who are smallpox experts, are helping with the centers's course on the disease. They said in interviews that they would show course participants pictures of smallpox lesions at various stages of development.

The course leaders are also trying to find ways to put photographs of smallpox lesions on the Internet so that doctors anywhere will recognize it if they see a real or suspected case.

Participants will also learn how to use the two-pronged needle required to administer smallpox vaccine.

But disease centers officials are not planning mass smallpox vaccinations at this time. One reason is that not enough vaccine exists. Another is that the risks of mass vaccination could outweigh any benefits, particularly if no smallpox case appears.

Smallpox vaccine, made from a different virus, has risks that are difficult to quantify for today's population.

Among the 5.5 million Americans who received their first smallpox vaccination in 1968, Dr. Lane said, eight died as a result. About two people per million who were vaccinated had an often fatal reaction known as vaccinia necrosum, which destroyed flesh and muscle. About four per million developed encephalitis, or inflammation of the brain.

Today, a particular concern is the hundreds of thousands of Americans with weakened immune systems from H.I.V. and other viruses, as well as drugs used to treat cancer and prevent rejection of organ transplants. The danger is that such people can become ill from the vaccine itself, and transmit the vaccine virus to other people, including those with impaired immune systems.

The standard epidemiologic response to smallpox is to identify the disease, isolate cases, vaccinate everyone known to have had direct contact with infected people since the first week of symptoms and then monitor their state of health.

Mass vaccination is not considered the appropriate medical response to an outbreak of smallpox. But if epidemiologic information determines that the virus was introduced widely through the air — at a public gathering, for instance — then mass vaccination might be required.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
To: Dixie Mom
How do you "ping an article"?
21 posted on 11/07/2001 1:00:18 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: boris
Hence pharmecutical makers don't want to make vaccines--especially given the legal liability issues from the few persons who have a bad reaction to a vaccine.

I suspect it's the liability issues that have much to do with it. They might be trying to develop an attenuated vaccine which they didn't use back a few decades ago because only the live unattenuated virus has ever worked. We have many immune compromised people now that there are some real risks to the live vaccine virus being given, but it would be better if we were given the choice. My kids can easily handle the old type of vaccine and I should be allowed to have them protected now.

22 posted on 11/07/2001 3:09:49 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
I think it's like everything, the old vaccine isn't going to be safe for people with AIDS and people who have other problems, but it's very safe for the majority of us. So the big-brother government is deciding for us all instead of letting us decide for ourselves. They'll allow us a to be put at real risk and yet make much less sensible vaccines be mandatory.
23 posted on 11/07/2001 3:12:28 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
The benefit of mass vaccination is that it takes smallpox off the table for the terrorists.

Yes, and we're so worried the Muslims could have obtained smallpox from the Russians but it's just as or more likely they obtained it from us, either bribing someone or by gaining employment at the labs that store it because we've been extremely lax.

Vaccinations should be given now to those who choose them, and if most of us are vaccinated, those who cannot be ---like the chemo patients or AIDS patients and others, would still be safer because the spread of smallpox would be extremely curtailed.

24 posted on 11/07/2001 3:17:49 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
I favor mass vaccination, but I don't agree that "those who choose" should be able to consume our 7-15 million dose stockpile prior to an outbreak.

The plans I have seen to deploy vaccine to abort an attack are well thought out and should not be compromised by vaccination on demand.

I think how effective we are being in producing new doses, or acquiring supply elsewhere, is (should be) a military secret, and I will not speculate on it.

If, after we have a supply to immunize the population (never-vaccinated first), we don't do so because of FDA regs or liability issues, no one will be more critical than I. For now, I think the people with the responsibility are behaving quite-responsibly.

25 posted on 11/07/2001 3:25:19 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
How do you "ping an article"?

"Ping an article" refers to bringing the article to someone's attention by replying to the article and including that person's name in the "reply to" box. You can also ping (or flag) an article to a special interest list by typing the name of the list in the box. FR special interest (or bump) lists are located here. People interested in a specific topic can then search all articles posted that are pertinent to that topic and properly flagged. Individuals can use the "Self Search" feature to locate articles where other members have pinged/flagged them. Also, by "bumping" an article, you effectively flag yourself since your replies will also show up on a self search. The whole process makes navigating FR easier. Hope that helps. :)

26 posted on 11/07/2001 3:42:02 AM PST by Dixie Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
We'll see. I've read where they're saying there should be more supplies by summer and I don't see the responsibility in that because it just makes people afraid that it would take that long. I also don't understand why they don't make enough supplies now and let the terrorist know they shouldn't even bother using smallpox. I know they are waiting for the outbreaks to happen before they supply an area with the vaccine, they are counting on doctors, nurses and other hospital staff to treat smallpox patients, become exposed first to smallpox and then be vaccinated after the fact. They'll also expose their own families and friends who then can be vaccinated after the fact. I don't trust that theory of vaccination after you show smallpox symptoms.
27 posted on 11/07/2001 3:46:59 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
>>I don't trust that theory of vaccination after you show smallpox symptoms<<

OK, but would you really give ALL of the CURRENT US vaccine (however much that is) on a first-come, first-serve basis?

28 posted on 11/07/2001 3:55:08 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Not as long as it's only the 15 million vaccines, but since it's a live virus vaccine, I don't see why it would take months to make more, they should allow some of the regulations to be lowered, allow more labs to produce it. A live virus like vaccinia can reproduce itself overnight in the right host, it isn't attenuated so it doesn't need all that much done to it. I think it's possible they are making a lot of it (really the virus makes itself) and it will soon be available, but I don't know why some are implying it will take months.
29 posted on 11/07/2001 4:01:23 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Maybe it should be a military secret and the citizens should be told something else other than the truth, but I'm not sure why. I think the terrorists would be less likely to bother trying it, if they knew we are ready to be vaccinated very soon, and the citizens would be less afraid.
30 posted on 11/07/2001 4:03:52 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Endeavor; Hillary's Lovely Legs; 2Jedismom; Billie; Snow Bunny; Iowa Granny; pubmom; mykdsmom
P I N G ! ) ) )
31 posted on 11/07/2001 4:04:37 AM PST by Carolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
we're more likely to contain the disease than the Islamic countries which are crowded and have questionable sanitation.

Agreed. Any terrorist release of communicable diseases would hit the third-world (e.g., Islamic countries) much harder than the West.

I don't think OBL and company want to go down in history as the destroyers of Islam.

32 posted on 11/07/2001 4:20:07 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: samtheman; Carolina
I have already spoken with my doctor about this. He said he'd vaccinate us as soon as he gets the vaccine. He's all for it.
33 posted on 11/07/2001 4:27:50 AM PST by 2Jedismom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
>>I think the terrorists would be less likely to bother trying it, if they knew we are ready to be vaccinated very soon, and the citizens would be less afraid.<<

Imagine if CDC issued a press release that said, "On December 15, we will have 20% coverage, increasing by 20%/month until April, when we will begin universal immunization.

Vaccine is being produced at locations, X, Y, and Z".

Assuming that there is still some disincentive for Saddam to sign his own death warrant by releasing smallpox, don't you think this creates a use-it-or-lose it scenario for the terrorists?

34 posted on 11/07/2001 4:37:12 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: boris
Hasn't Russia also offered to sell us smallpox vaccine?

I'd like to know what the reason is that only now are we starting this crash program for producing smallpox vaccine. According to the articles on the al Qaeda manual published on Sunday, we have had that manual, which shows an interest in biological weapons, since 1999. Is the failure to start a crash program back then another instance of Clinton's treason?

35 posted on 11/07/2001 4:46:17 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: angkor
If smallpox was released by an Islamic source, I would think that Islamic countries would be the last to receive the vaccine

If ever...

36 posted on 11/07/2001 4:47:47 AM PST by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: JoeEveryman
Are you sure vaccination will still cure AFTER symptoms develop? I thought you needed to vaccinate within a few days of infection. Smallpox has an incubation period of 8 to 17 days, usually 10 to 12 days.
37 posted on 11/07/2001 4:50:20 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NYS_Eric
Plus, the terrorists -- certainly their leaders -- may well be vaccinated already. I.e., no risk to them.
38 posted on 11/07/2001 4:51:32 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
I know they are waiting for the outbreaks to happen before they supply an area with the vaccine ...

Consider 30% of those infected are projected to die. Horrendous. 15 million shots are available now with the remainder of 285 million Americans waiting many months for the supply to ramp up. This measures the window of opportunity for the murderers.

The Demon in the Freezer makes mention of the hemmorhagic form of "black pox" smallpox. Nasty weapons.

Well. these clowns are suicidal and would destroy the civilization that feeds them so it is only fitting they would unleash such nastiness. I expect the worst before we are done with this attack.

39 posted on 11/07/2001 4:55:22 AM PST by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: flamefront

40 posted on 11/07/2001 5:02:18 AM PST by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson