Skip to comments.
THIS WILL OPEN YOUR EYES.
Paul Harvey
| Paul Harvey
Posted on 11/03/2001 6:03:18 AM PST by JohnPaulJones
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 last
To: Joe 6-pack
You must have missed this the first 2,394,732 times it was posted...I did. :-}
To: Joe 6-pack
Don't kid yourself or anyone else. The story about the New Haven Black Panther murder trials well deserves re-telling and more so than Slick Willie's draft dodging efforts. The actual killer of Alex Rackley was one George Sams, your basic retarded bundle of racist emotions rubbed raw by professionals like the late 60s New Left leadership.
Many here may find it hard to believe that Hillary, et al., are worse than the actual killers, but it is true. Most of the surviving New Haven Panther defendants and particularly Warren Kimbro have become solid citizens. Mr. Kimbro now votes and lives as conservatively as most of us and more so than many. He runs community service programs for convicts and is very tough on the convicts. He pled guilty in the conspiracy, did his time, paid the price, never whined and is as good an example of genuine rehabilitation as you will ever see.
Her Satanic Majesty is an unrepentant swine who graduated the Wellesley re-education camp of the 60's to become a willing and useful handmaiden of Saul Alinsky's dedicated effort to destroy your country and mine. She is now in the United States Senate with more than an eye on a tenure of her own in the White House. She is, in a word, a menace.
What really gets me to wondering is why there are always folks like Joe Six-pack who seem to claim conservatism as their cause while spending their time throwing stumbling blocks in the path of those who want to actually do something about the likes of Hitlery.
The devastated corpse of Alex Rackley was dumped in a swamp in Middlefield, Connecticut, not in a river and a lot more than two miles north of New Haven. When Bobby Seale's jury was deadlocked at the end of his trial and the jury dismissed before the case was dismissed by Judge Harold Mulvey, one black juror escorted Chairman Bobby to the front steps of the New Haven County courthouse to join him in giving the Black Power clenched fist salute.
My source? I lived in an inner suburb of New Haven at the time, am a contemporary of Hitlery, practiced criminal defense law in Connecticut until moving to the midwest two years ago, and am acquainted with some of the principal characters.
This is not just another thirty-year old story. New York's junior Senator would like nothing more than to be appointing a majority of the United States Supreme Court. Keep arguing among ourselves about this little point or that and she will get that opportunity. If so, I am going to miss America. It was one of my favorite things.
62
posted on
11/03/2001 8:06:12 AM PST
by
BlackElk
To: AuntB
Michael Medved was there too. He has made some interesting comments on the situation. Medved says Hillary was not the worst at Yale at that time. She was a moderate socialist. The SDS crowd were the real nuts. And I think he is correct. I worked at Yale-New Haven hospital with some SDS crazies. Neo-Stalinists everyone.
To: kayak
what you said.
To: JohnPaulJones
Thanks again Hillary.
65
posted on
11/03/2001 8:43:12 AM PST
by
boycott
To: Joe 6-pack
Lighten up. This is the first time I've read this. I think we need to post it another 2,000,000 times.
To: RightOnline; kayak
Except for the fact that the trial described never happened, and Paul Harvey did not write this, I would agree with you.
The only value there is in posting this is to get a chance to remind people that it is a hoax. An internet urban legend.
Not that Hillary's politics are not correctly identified, but....
To: Ratatoskr
Say, would you eat a peanut butter sandwich with only small bits of mouse crap in it?
Your analogy is self-serving. A more appropriate one would be: gold ore has only ounces of gold per ton of totally worthless crap. Are you really going to refine it? This story has more than a few ounces of gold. It's worthwhile separating the fact from the fiction rather than make mouse-turd analogies in order to be able to ignore it in toto.
68
posted on
11/03/2001 9:17:19 AM PST
by
aruanan
To: Joe 6-pack
The archives are dead.
To: JohnPaulJones
Neal Boortz wrote this, first.
70
posted on
11/03/2001 9:25:57 AM PST
by
Crawdad
To: Republic
clinton hunt-and-peck BUMP!
|
- NUANCE, RADICALISM & THE CLINTONS
- by Mia T
- Don't lose
- Your head
- To gain a minute
- You need your head
- Your brains are in it.
- --an old roadside ad, Pushme-Pullyou
-
-
-
-
- Implicit in current leftist dogma and sanguinary, i.e., Bloodworth-Thomason, PR intended to rehabilitate hillary clinton is that unlike her self-absorbed husband, hillary clinton has a core; the purported evidence: hillary clinton champions radical--and, thus, by definition, unpopular--causes, while bill clinton plumps for any cause that will help bill clinton.
-
- But the truth of the matter is that neither clinton has a core. Rather,the clintons are permanently conjoined at a cavity conspicuously empty except for ego, that place where brain and soul and guts and heart normally reside.
-
- The wife's problem is not a sensitivity to ethics but an insensitivity to nuance; this, as opposed to the husband's cloyingly excessive, stomach-turning, lip-biting obsession with nuance of a solipsistic, deconstructionist, amoral sort so appealing to the narcissist. And so the wife is propelled by extremes and the husband is paralyzed by gradations.
-
- The error is to equate motion with mores...That the inexorable endpoint is depravity in both instances is sufficient evidence of a corelessness in both instances.
-
- clinton hyper- and hypo-sensitivity to nuance with their attendant paralysis and motion, respectively, are two sides of the same coin. Both derive from the same fundamental defects--an arrogance and a dimwittedness.
That is to say, the clintons are too arrogant and dimwitted to understand that the demagogic process in this fiberoptic age isn't about counting spun heads; it's about not discounting circumambient brains. |
- clintonism and the theology of contempt
-
by Mia T
-
-
- Let us hope that the rabbi's question was merely rhetorical. . . Let us hope that Rabbi Potasnik, and by extension, New York Jews, are not as credulous and obsequious and passive as they appear. . .
-
- The simple answer to the rabbi's question is that the corrupt, self-serving, anti-Semitic, power-hungry harpy cannot be trusted.
-
- Weren't we to never forget?
-
-
- The Holocaust must remain, for Jew and Christian alike, a constant reminder that mass credulity and obsequiousness and passivity are necessary for the demagogue to prevail.
-
- To remember that six million Jews died in the Holocaust is to understand that centuries of anti-Semitic attitudes made this horror possible. We must ask ourselves what role our society played through the centuries that in any way contributed to the atmosphere that made such a genocide even thinkable.
-
- Which brings me to the clintons and clintonism. . .
-
- Senator Patrick Moynihan proffered one of the more incisive operant definitions of clintonism -- "defining deviancy down."
-
- Defining deviancy down, indeed.
- clintonism has made personal and public perversions, personal and public predations, not merely thinkable, not merely acceptable, but de rigueur. (Watch us spin. . . and spin.}
-
- clintonism is the theology of contempt. Not merely toward "F___ing Jew-bastards," not merely toward "lazy niggers" or "extra-chromosome right-wingers" but toward any of us whose ideas are different from those of the clintons, Gore, and their acolytes.
-
- So the real question to be answered is this:
- "What fair-minded, clear-thinking person would want to continue
- with its theology of contempt?
- What fair-minded, clear-thinking person would vote for
hillary clinton or Al Gore?"
-
|
-
- When you don't vote, you let another church explode.
- When you don't vote, you allow another cross to burn.
- When you don't vote, you let another assault wound a brother or sister.
- When you don't vote, you let the Republicans continue. . .
- Voting will change things for the better.
- On November 3rd, vote.
- Vote smart.
- Vote Democratic for Congress and the U.S. Senate.
- ---racist clinton-clinton-gore-DNC ad (1998) directed to blacks
-
|
-
It is natural for man to indulge in the illusions of hope.
-
We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth,
-
and listen to the song of that siren
-
till she transforms us into beasts.
-
Is this the part of wise men,
-
engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty?
-
Are we disposed to be the number of those
-
who, having eyes, see not,
-
and having ears, hear not,
-
the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation?
-
For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost,
-
I am willing to know the whole truth;
-
to know the worst, and to provide for it.
-
-----------------Patrick Henry
In a dark time, the eye begins to see.
-
----------------- Theodore Roethke
|
71
posted on
11/03/2001 1:23:22 PM PST
by
Mia T
To: FrogMom
bump
72
posted on
11/03/2001 1:25:38 PM PST
by
timestax
To: Mia T
-clintonism is the theology of contempt. Not merely toward "F___ing Jew-bastards," not merely toward "lazy niggers" or "extra-chromosome right-wingers" but toward any of us whose ideas are different from those of the clintons, Gore, and their acolytes.Out of the PARK! MiaT-you always knock me out. What dead-on fabulous writing!
73
posted on
11/03/2001 1:38:21 PM PST
by
Republic
To: Teacher317
It says Hillary supported the murder and his accomplices, which is verified in several places in this thread. No it doesn't. It says she "shut down Yale", which is crap. It implies her blanket defense of the panthers, which is unproven. At most, it looks like she may have assisted the lawyer who represented somebody present at the crime who wasn't the shooter (defending criminals in court, even really horrible ones, is an integral part of our legal system).
We don't do ourselves any favors clinging to falsehoods because they have a grain of truth in them.
To: aruanan
Your analogy is self-serving. So is yours.
Look, why don't you post a story about how Bill Clinton had sex with an intern then flung off his clothes and danced around the white house lawn beating squirrels to death with a paperweight and shouting "I am the antichrist!"
After all, he had sex with an intern, didn't he?
To: JohnPaulJones
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson