Skip to comments.
Was it wrong to lead viewers to believe that the homosexual heroes were heterosexual?
Posted on 11/01/2001 4:34:14 PM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-173 next last
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Who gives a rodents rectum?
21
posted on
11/01/2001 4:54:06 PM PST
by
lawdude
To: 11th Earl of Mar
And that the hijackers needed a bit more jacking to reduce their anger
22
posted on
11/01/2001 4:55:12 PM PST
by
FUSSBALL
To: lawdude
Bottom line: Who cares? Narcissistic obsession with their phallus, irrespective of human carnage or tragedy.
To: FUSSBALL
"liberal" estimate is actually a pretty good characterization, FB! Most estimates run closer to 2-3%. Even accounting for heavy recruitment and attempts to normalize the behaviors over the last decade, I can't imagine it to be higher than 4%.
BTW, I love that screenname of yours - that's what we used to call our kids when they were squalling!
To: FUSSBALL
I believe the 10% figure came from Kinsey who made it up to support his thesis.
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
I have a strong suspicion that several of the hijackers were homosexual, possibly repressed. I'm pretty sure about Atta. Should we trumpet that also?
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
When I heard about them, I didn't even consider who they liked to have sex with...either hetero or homo. They were just heroes.
To: MileHi
"Does that make them more heroic? Gimme a break..."
Yes. Just like using the language during a crime that identifies and derides the victim as a member of a minority makes you more dangerous...i.e. makes it "hate" crime. Ergo, a terrorized homo must be a true Saint! </sarcasm>
28
posted on
11/01/2001 4:56:54 PM PST
by
havoc1us
To: Senator Pardek
If one of these heroes was into group sex, would it be relevant? What about being into handcuffs, is that relevant?
To: FUSSBALL
I believe that it's against Federal Law to ask this question- at least on the Census Forms. Try to count 'em and the hue and cry of discrimination would be deafening! They want to perpetuate their lie- the truth need not apply.The GLAADs of the world want to spin, perish the truth- they've drummed up enough sympathy among the guilty liberal class to amplify their power geometrically.
30
posted on
11/01/2001 4:59:07 PM PST
by
M_Man
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
The only ones that want to make the heros' sexuality an issue are those that want those people remembered not for their courage but their flaws.
To: anniegetyourgun
SQUALLING?
32
posted on
11/01/2001 5:00:21 PM PST
by
FUSSBALL
To: Abn1508
ONe of the three guys who is known to have been involved in attacking the hijackers (Bingham, the rugby player) was gay. He was part of an all-gay rugby team. You need to get your facts straight. There is NO evidence that this man was one of the passengers who fought the hijackers.
There were others who told people on the phone that 'we are going to do something.' But this man did not tell his mother that. There was only hopeful speculation that this man, who was an agressive, large athlete who once fought off a mugger, actually participated in the attack.
If he did, he is a hero. But using your logic, everybody on board should be given a military burial. And everybody's sex partner[s?] should be given a flag.
To: IceCreamSocialist; Lilly
Welcome to FR this week. I believe there is plenty of reference in scripture to fornication = sin. But then, most folks don't believe that anymore - they are too busy "choosing the rules" they will follow......
To: Gordian Blade
I read in The Star that Atta and his co-pilot had been gay lovers for years.
To: lawdude
Who gives a rodents rectum? That would be Richard Gere
To: CharacterCounts
I read something by Kinsey once. The man is a fool. And anyone who agrees with him is also. He uses what I call "slight of hand" logic. Its like magic but it dont take a big secret to figure out he is trying to fool people. (Must think people are really stupid) well....hard to argue at times
37
posted on
11/01/2001 5:01:56 PM PST
by
FUSSBALL
To: M_Man
Truth is there's less homos than Arab-Americans in America. Oh the shame!!:-)
38
posted on
11/01/2001 5:01:56 PM PST
by
klee
To: IceCreamSocialist
If you don't like the chapter Lilly quoted, try Romans 1: 24-32. The teaching is crystal clear--homosexuality is forbidden in Judeo-Christianity.
39
posted on
11/01/2001 5:02:05 PM PST
by
JMJ333
To: Gordian Blade
I have a strong suspicion that several of the hijackers were homosexual, possibly repressed. I'm pretty sure about Atta. Should we trumpet that also?Makes you wonder where Allah will come up with 72 gay male virgins.
40
posted on
11/01/2001 5:02:18 PM PST
by
Alouette
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-173 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson