To: syriacus
And the same is true for magazines at a newsstand. Remember, too, that thus far, the anthrax hasn't killed or even infected that many people--a handful, compared to what happened at the WTC and the Pentagon. So they're not very efficient in any event--and for that, we can be most thankful!!
To: golitely
Remember, too, that thus far, the anthrax hasn't killed or even infected that many people--a handful, compared to what happened at the WTC and the Pentagon. So they're not very efficient in any event--and for that, we can be most thankful!!Yes. We have been fortunate.
Maybe the newspaper was only used to hide the contaminated letter until it was mailed. Maybe it wasn't intended as a weapon, but to hide a weapon. I guess it could have been thrown in a trash can, then picked up off the top of the can by some unsuspecting commuter who brought the paper onto a train.
50 posted on
11/01/2001 6:28:51 AM PST by
syriacus
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson