Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Libertarians: Repeal all gun laws
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Thursday, November 1, 2001 | Jon Dougherty

Posted on 10/31/2001 10:11:16 PM PST by JohnHuang2

WND
Libertarians: Repeal
all gun laws

Party calls firearms 'practical solution' to problem of terrorism


By Jon Dougherty
© 2001 WorldNetDaily.com

One result of the recent terrorist attacks in the U.S. has been a surge in gun sales, prompting the Libertarian Party to call on lawmakers to repeal a number of gun-control measures.

"More Americans are beginning to realize that the Second Amendment is not some fossilized remnant of a frontier nation, but a practical solution to the 21st century problem of terrorism," Steve Dasbach, the party's national director, said yesterday. "Now, it's time for politicians to acknowledge this change in attitude – as well as the new reality of the terrorism threat – and immediately start repealing laws that prohibit law-abiding Americans from buying and carrying firearms to protect themselves and their families."

The party quoted recent media reports denoting the rise in gun sales.

The Washington Post, on Oct. 2, reported "a surge in gun sales" following the Sept. 11 attacks against the U.S. The paper said that applications to buy handguns in Virginia doubled the week after the attack, and background checks for handguns, rifles and shotguns went up by 32 percent.

Forty-five percent more Americans "value Second Amendment rights" than before the terrorist attacks, according to an NRA poll reported by U.S. News & World Report in the magazine's Nov. 5 issue.

In Colorado, background checks for concealed-carry permits jumped 172 percent from August to October, according to the Rocky Mountain News' Oct. 30 edition.

In Connecticut, 41 percent more people bought guns in September 2001 than in the same month last year, according to an Oct. 2 Associated Press report.

Women across the country are signing up for gun safety courses in record numbers, according to the Oct. 10 "Today Show" on NBC, with sales of guns to women increasing by 60 percent.

CBS Morning News reported Oct. 2 that gun sales in California – arguably the most restrictive gun control state in the union – rose 42 percent since the attacks.

The reason for so much renewed interest in guns is obvious, Dasbach said.

"Americans have begun to realize, following the Sept. 11 tragedy, that government and police cannot keep them safe from every danger."

"There is simply no way the government can protect 280 million Americans from stealthy terrorists or even garden-variety criminals," the party leader said. "Americans have begun to understand that they must take personal responsibility for their own safety. That's why we're seeing such a surge in gun sales – especially to vulnerable demographic groups, like women."

Currently, the LP noted that about 21,000 federal, state and local laws limit or prohibit the carrying of concealed firearms or ban outright the carry or ownership of others. Such bans and restrictions are leaving Americans at risk, the party says.

"Sept. 11 was a wake-up call to America that we are vulnerable to terrorists," noted Dasbach. "Now, politicians need to wake up and start repealing the 21,000 gun-control laws they passed over the last few decades."

He added, "It is unconscionable that old-fashioned gun laws and anti-gun politicians can prevent Americans from protecting themselves and their families from murderous terrorists."

For Education And Discussion Only. Not For Commercial Use.



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-229 next last
To: CWRWinger
If you have the right to FORCE Stoners to be moral, while damaging the Fabric of the Constitution, to enforce the WOD...

Shouldn't Elected officials (Freedom) and Thieves (Property) be expected to act morally responsible as well, Since the Former (Stoners) Are hurting no one, and the Latter have the potential to harm many?

Adhering to the Constitution, would hold the Latter in check, allowing the former to debase themselves in such manner as they choose. PROHIBITION IS ALWAYS A LOSING PROPOSTITION IN A FREE SOCIETY

It has been tried twice, and failed miserably....

41 posted on 11/01/2001 4:14:30 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: riley1992; CWRWinger
Evidentally CWRWinger is one of those 'cut and paste' jobs kinda poster. Shows quite a lack of imagination.

Doesn't appear that Constitutional knowledge, or Logic, are strong suits either....

42 posted on 11/01/2001 4:16:07 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
Probably gonn start posting pictures of addicts and calling them libertarians, or graphs that he says will show that prohibition merely coinsided with a rise in crime but had nothing to do with it.

Thee dorks are nothing but disrupters, and not enen good ones at that.

What discussion of RKBA have we had? None.

43 posted on 11/01/2001 4:16:12 AM PST by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
It's a question worth repeating. I see no one has been able to answer that one. I was hoping someone would take a crack at it. Sigh, no real libertarians here.
44 posted on 11/01/2001 4:17:23 AM PST by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
What discussion of RKBA have we had? None.

That's because that would deviate from their crib notes from 'How To Sound Like An Idiot While Making Stuff Up About Libertarians 101". They would be lost without those.

45 posted on 11/01/2001 4:18:39 AM PST by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Comment #46 Removed by Moderator

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: CWRWinger
Has it occured to you that no one is going to answer that because none of us get stoned? Fine tune your argument and maybe you will receive an answer. Until then, go play in the sandbox.
48 posted on 11/01/2001 4:22:09 AM PST by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
Probably gonn start graphs that he says will show that prohibition merely coinsided with a rise in crime but had nothing to do with it.

Leave poor Dane out of this...poor bastard doesn't even realize that that graph makes the argument against his point...lol

49 posted on 11/01/2001 4:22:34 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
I believe citizens of this country should be allowed to own whatever they can carry, including full auto assult weapons. I do not want illegal aliens carrying anything, though.
50 posted on 11/01/2001 4:22:39 AM PST by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
God I can't wait till election time so we can bicker over irrelevant Liberaltarian Candidates taking votes away from electable candidates..

Why wait?

If they're so "irrelevant", how do they take votes from anybody? Besides, if they're so "liberal" how the hell would they take votes away from Republican candidates? Methinks this is just making excuses for Republican failures.
51 posted on 11/01/2001 4:22:50 AM PST by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: tex-oma
LOL. This place is rife with them this morning.
52 posted on 11/01/2001 4:24:43 AM PST by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
2nd Amendment
BUMP
53 posted on 11/01/2001 4:24:52 AM PST by Fiddlstix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger
It's a question worth repeating. I see no one has been able to answer that one.

I answered it quite succinctly in #41....Now, if your little pea brain doesn't ache from the concept, maybe you would like to engage the subject LOGICALLY, beyond that point....Otherwise admit your are not up to that task and I'll say...

Thanx for Playing....

54 posted on 11/01/2001 4:24:56 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
"...none of us get stoned.."

Is that a fact?

Time to go to work, no real libertarians here to answer my question. Thanks for your replies, except one.

55 posted on 11/01/2001 4:25:34 AM PST by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger
Have a good day at work and feel free to come back and answer my questions if you ever come up with something to say.
56 posted on 11/01/2001 4:26:59 AM PST by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: alpowolf
And I am sure you enjoy being on the same side as Senator Maria Cantwell.....She really works to further your agenda....

Whereas, the Judges being held up by Senate Majority Leader Dasshole, would not......

Hey, I could be wrong...

57 posted on 11/01/2001 4:27:08 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger
Idiot, was extremely generous. I'm quite certain the Libertarian party did not reach the leadership position it holds in the third party movement, espousing the stupidity found in #3. I would submit, that the founding fathers just might consider the platform of the Libertarian Party to be at least as close to their view of correct Constitutional thinking, as the Republican or Democrat Party platforms.

Member Constitution Party.

58 posted on 11/01/2001 4:30:27 AM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger
believe citizens of this country should be allowed to own whatever they can carry,

Actually, (a short lesson in the Constitution) Citizens should be able to own whatever they can AFFORD....Yes, Jets, Battleships what not....Before you disagree..Statist, go read and research exactly what is implied by Congress' granted ability to provide "Letters of Marque and Reprisal"...

59 posted on 11/01/2001 4:30:48 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

Comment #60 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-229 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson