Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Libertarians: Repeal all gun laws
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Thursday, November 1, 2001 | Jon Dougherty

Posted on 10/31/2001 10:11:16 PM PST by JohnHuang2

WND
Libertarians: Repeal
all gun laws

Party calls firearms 'practical solution' to problem of terrorism


By Jon Dougherty
© 2001 WorldNetDaily.com

One result of the recent terrorist attacks in the U.S. has been a surge in gun sales, prompting the Libertarian Party to call on lawmakers to repeal a number of gun-control measures.

"More Americans are beginning to realize that the Second Amendment is not some fossilized remnant of a frontier nation, but a practical solution to the 21st century problem of terrorism," Steve Dasbach, the party's national director, said yesterday. "Now, it's time for politicians to acknowledge this change in attitude – as well as the new reality of the terrorism threat – and immediately start repealing laws that prohibit law-abiding Americans from buying and carrying firearms to protect themselves and their families."

The party quoted recent media reports denoting the rise in gun sales.

The Washington Post, on Oct. 2, reported "a surge in gun sales" following the Sept. 11 attacks against the U.S. The paper said that applications to buy handguns in Virginia doubled the week after the attack, and background checks for handguns, rifles and shotguns went up by 32 percent.

Forty-five percent more Americans "value Second Amendment rights" than before the terrorist attacks, according to an NRA poll reported by U.S. News & World Report in the magazine's Nov. 5 issue.

In Colorado, background checks for concealed-carry permits jumped 172 percent from August to October, according to the Rocky Mountain News' Oct. 30 edition.

In Connecticut, 41 percent more people bought guns in September 2001 than in the same month last year, according to an Oct. 2 Associated Press report.

Women across the country are signing up for gun safety courses in record numbers, according to the Oct. 10 "Today Show" on NBC, with sales of guns to women increasing by 60 percent.

CBS Morning News reported Oct. 2 that gun sales in California – arguably the most restrictive gun control state in the union – rose 42 percent since the attacks.

The reason for so much renewed interest in guns is obvious, Dasbach said.

"Americans have begun to realize, following the Sept. 11 tragedy, that government and police cannot keep them safe from every danger."

"There is simply no way the government can protect 280 million Americans from stealthy terrorists or even garden-variety criminals," the party leader said. "Americans have begun to understand that they must take personal responsibility for their own safety. That's why we're seeing such a surge in gun sales – especially to vulnerable demographic groups, like women."

Currently, the LP noted that about 21,000 federal, state and local laws limit or prohibit the carrying of concealed firearms or ban outright the carry or ownership of others. Such bans and restrictions are leaving Americans at risk, the party says.

"Sept. 11 was a wake-up call to America that we are vulnerable to terrorists," noted Dasbach. "Now, politicians need to wake up and start repealing the 21,000 gun-control laws they passed over the last few decades."

He added, "It is unconscionable that old-fashioned gun laws and anti-gun politicians can prevent Americans from protecting themselves and their families from murderous terrorists."

For Education And Discussion Only. Not For Commercial Use.



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-229 last
To: tortoise
I've found is a gradient based on cognitive ability.

Help me understand this...you're not saying someone with Alzheimers Disease is less of a person than you or I, are you? After all, their cognitive ability is far inferior to ours.

221 posted on 11/02/2001 11:50:54 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Ubonic
Those terms you listed are easy to throw around, but I'd be interested in hearing you explain what exactly each of the 10 entail, and how you'd go about accomplishing them. What's more, how would you go about accomplishing each without contradicting one of the others?
222 posted on 11/02/2001 11:59:05 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
Help me understand this...you're not saying someone with Alzheimers Disease is less of a person than you or I, are you? After all, their cognitive ability is far inferior to ours.

Exactly. While this may not sit well in Happy Land, this has always been true. Our society and our legal system (and for that matter essentially all such systems in the world) hold the cognitively impaired to be less of a person than someone who is not. Most legal systems have almost always granted "lesser person" status to all sorts of humans with a wide-range of problems. A person with severe Alzheimers is not generally recognized to be as much of a "person" as you may be by legal or social convention. Same with the mentally retarded. It isn't nice, but neither is the world.

We are all animals, but it is our minds that make us "people". In a similar vein, I consider my life to have infinite value, but I am honest enough to know that my own and every other life has a very finite value in reality. These are brutal truths, and not likely to sit well with idealists. Nonetheless, I would rather see the world like it is in all its ugliness than to pretend reality is something that it is not.

223 posted on 11/02/2001 12:11:18 PM PST by tortoise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: tortoise
Our society and our legal system (and for that matter essentially all such systems in the world) hold the cognitively impaired to be less of a person than someone who is not.

Try murdering someone with Alzheimers and claim you can't be prosecuted because they're "not a person". While their capacity is diminished, their right to life is the same as yours or mine. How is a fetus any different?

224 posted on 11/02/2001 12:19:10 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
Actually the Thomas Jefferson solution of a national charitable initiative for education was a good idea. I would prefer smaller scale state or private charitable education funds with purely voluntary contributions. That way those that cannot pay for education would have a way to get the education they desire.

$10,000 a year is a very expensive education. A bit of private sector competition could reduce the cost of education and increase results. You really have to wonder when I can take a child out of school, homeschool them for just three hours a day and have them gain two years of academic achievement over their friends of the same age in public schools in just nine months. This with no more than $200 in education materials.

Education should be compulsory not because government says you must go to school. Education should be personally compulsory because you desire to eat food and live with a roof overhead. Education would have more status and value because it would have to be purchased like a pair of athletic shoes. A competitive vertical market would make our youth the very best educated in the world.

225 posted on 11/02/2001 12:21:49 PM PST by scottiewottie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
# 208

knock it off with the flames.

ROTFL. Stop making sense, they mean.LOL

I don't see where you flamed anybody. So much for my career as a censor.

226 posted on 11/02/2001 11:29:41 PM PST by NoCurrentFreeperByThatName
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: NoCurrentFreeperByThatName
So much for my career as a censor.

Well, there's always McDonald's. LOL

227 posted on 11/03/2001 1:27:09 AM PST by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
Mornin'

Well, there's always McDonald's.LOL

Hey lady, you wanna super-size this order? LOL

228 posted on 11/03/2001 1:53:27 AM PST by NoCurrentFreeperByThatName
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: NoCurrentFreeperByThatName
"Excuse me, did you wash your hands before touching my Big Mac?"
229 posted on 11/03/2001 1:55:38 AM PST by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-229 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson