The Cancer Racket Exposed

Gavin Phillips ^ | 10.31.01 | Gavin Phillips

[abnegation]

Dittos....and I'm happy to say my cancer treatment worked and I am cured...even was a new procedure. I have no complaints.

[jonesat]

I'm writting this with mixed emotions. I'm now six months out with "No Evidence of Disease" and a 50% prognosis. Anyone who has spent some time with cancer knows that 1) blanket statements about effective treatments can't be made. In the same way that there are diffent causes, there are different cures. 2)Since there is no one type of cancer and they all act/react differently it complicates the research. 3) Cancer treatments (even for one as rare as mine) are based on extensive, documented medical treatment studies. In fact it can be regarded a almost coldly analytical (appropriate for such a coldly efficient disease). Having said all that, It is assanine to assume that a disease as malevolent as this one is being perpetuated by a conspiracy. Indeed, if one believes that there is a conspiracy to cure cancer, why did the industry cure smallpox? Or why does it bother to make such powerfull antibiotics to cure common infections? Why not just make us buy more and more weak and worthless ones? In fact I can show you an example of why the industry is acting in a completely logical and efficient way. One can easily look at the commonality of the cancer type (how often it occures) and the amount of drugs in development and/or money being spent on it's cure. This logical distribution of effort, reflects the patern you would expect for an industry working on solutions for a given problem. Cancer treatment today is far superior to what it was ten years ago, and infinitely better than it was twenty years ago. IT STILL SUCKS, but that is sometimes the way life goes. Since EVERYONE is at risk to get cancer it is stupid to assume that some well paid scientist or CEO is purposely squashing a cure. If you all ask my nicely, mabey I'll explain why chemotherapy has to be so harsh in order to tackle one of the most coldly efficient killers we commonly face.

[unclejon]

I agree that there may be effective alternative treatments for cancer. I feel that I owe my life to an herbal mixture called Essaic. Over 10 years ago I was diagnosed with a form of lymphoma (cancer of the lymph glands). I was told that it was treatable but not curable. And that in time the treatments, chemo and radiation, would no longer be effective. Well, I had both, and the cancer came back both times as predicted. It was then that I began researching and experimenting with alternatives. Glad I did. I will never know for sure if I am cured and what is responsible, but I have had no symptoms for 7 years.

The problem with alternatives is most of them are unpatentable. Therefore, there is no way to ever hope of selling for a profit. No one would would invest the hundreds of millions to develope, test, and pass FDA regs if one cannot expect a return.

Also, that is why there is generally little scientific proof due to minimal amount of controlled studies. In light of that, all claims of success are ridiculed as anecdotal.

The fact that I am alive today is merely anecdotal evidence that to a doctor proves nothing. The absence of any clinical disease is explained as "spontaneous remission".

On the other hand, the fact that I am alive today, flies in the face of years of reasearch, which predicts that I should have died several years ago.

I feel it is counterproductive and unhealthful, to get caught up in conspiracy theories, even though I believe there is much more than a grain of truth to some of these ideas.

Therefore I believe the best thing to do is try to spread the word on the availability of alternatives and do everything we can to break down the barriers to their manufacture and use.

[det dweller too]

http://www.cancermed.com/

The above is a link to Dr. B's web site. I have heard allot about him and his fight. He is for real and he has uncovered a nasty underbelly of the connection of big medical research and big money. If Dr. B's stuff works, BILLIONS of research dollars will go elsewhere, and there are many who just can't let that happen.

[concerned about politics]

Asprin comes from the willow tree.
It is a natural substance, and therefore cannot be patented. That's why it so cheap, but look at the price on non-asprins!

Know why the cancer society was studying the peach pit? It's a relative to the almond. An almond or two a day and you need not fear cancer.
"Stress has been linked to cancer."
Know why? The large intestine closes during stress. It is the bodies way of keeping food in the system for longer periods. It's part of the "fight or flight" reflex.
Modern food is full of toxins, it's tampered with from the field to the table.
An almond will supply the body with a very light weight oil, and the food will will pass through the tightened intestine, comfortably.
it also contains acids that cause the formation of bile, assisting the oil as it passes.
When the toxic foods are allowed to pass, the poisons do not build up and weaken the system. The cells will not mutate.
By studying the peach pit, the almonds cousin, a patent medicine can be developed.
The cancer industry has become like the red Cross, a billion dollar industry. If they "found" a cure, millions would be lost in "donations" and millions of jobs would be lost.
Plant an almond tree, because you heard it here first. Many diseases will someday be cured by the simple almond tree.
You heard it here first!

[concerned about politics]

I'll take a copy.
Anyone ever heard of ESSIAC? It's a Indian recipe from Canada. It contains slippery elm bark, also Indian Burdock root. There's more, but these two things cause the intestines to cramp, but you can't feel it it's so light. The slippery elm causes the same affect as the almond.
There's testomony about various remedies, but I find the majority has a cleansing property.

[backhoe]

-http://www.cancermed.com--

[lonestar]

Bursynski made his treatment , I think, from urine and charged thousands of dollars. Many of his patients later considered him a fraud.

He was "practicing" in Houston. Heard nothing of him recently.

[lonestar]

Where did you get it? I've heard that Patrick Kennedy was treated with it when he had cancer.

[spectre]

Urine? Whoops, nevermind!

sw

[concerned about politics]

I have the ESSIAC recipe some where. I took your FR name, and when I find it, I'll FRe-mail it to you. You can buy the herbs at any herb store. Slippery elm bark, Indian rhubarb root, sheep sorrel, and burdock root. I have to find the paper with amounts, because you use VERY LITTLE rhubarb root.
Try a search engine, but I'll still FRe-mail you.

[TX Bluebonnet]

I've been reading up on the cure by Royal Raymond Rife. Incredible stuff. Here's a link.

I've quit giving to the Cancer Society

[who knows what evil?]

I've quit giving to the Cancer Society.

Amen. It breaks my heart when I see so many well-intentioned people getting involved with "Race for the Cure" or other cancer fund-raisers du jour...it is just money down a rat hole. (See United Way and Red Cross.) There is too much money wrapped up in cancer for anybody to waste time finding a cure. You are much better off watching what you eat and drink than you are donating for the 'cause'.

[lonestar]

Constipation is the root of all evil. (Therefore, bin Laden is full of it!)

[RobRoy]

Ping-a-ling

[lonestar]

Ten years ago, cancer costs were $80 Billion a year.

Isn't cancer related to the immune system? When David, the bubble boy, came out of his bubble malignant tumors popped up all over him--best I remember.

[acitizen]

dude you are clueless and are spreading lies about a great man. now stop it!!!

[lonestar]

sorry

[LaineyDee]

I have read about Burzynski's treatments for over 10 yrs, through a health newletter that Dr. Whitaker puts out. It's a very interesting alternative to conventional medicine. Most of his patients are "last resort" types who have been given up by their doctors... and he still has an 85% cure rate. (According to Dr. Whitaker)

Burzynski Website