Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
As to the 'rebels' of 1812, you answered yourself, - they won their point.

No, maybe you missed the point. The point is that several northeastern states, who in 1861 send troops to back up their position that a state couldn't secede, felt strongly in 1814 that they had the LEGAL RIGHT to secede.

Can you please point out to me which Constitutional Amendment was passed and ratified between 1814 and 1860 that changed this fact? I know of none.

Are you that 'blind' to not be able to see the hypocrisy here, or are you just being coy?

143 posted on 11/01/2001 8:28:22 PM PST by smolensk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: smolensk
No hypocrisy, you see human nature in action. Those states used threats, & they won their point on the 1812 war.

The south could have done the same in 1860 , even used massive civil disobedience to win their points. -- They chose war, & paid for it.

To my mind, this is how the present day federal stranglehold can be broken. States can refuse to obey unconstitutional federal law, and protect their citizens from federal officials, by every means short of open rebellion.

'They' can't jail a whole state.

145 posted on 11/01/2001 8:50:26 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson