Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
No! It is not a nuclear explosion. It is a conventional explosion with nuclear material attached

I do believe that there is some confusion over the terms. As I have heard it, a dirty bomb is a nuke that leaves a lot of radioactive material laying around. A Radiological Bomb is what you seem to be referencing. It is the radioactive material bomb despersed with converntion explosives.

Richard W.

60 posted on 10/30/2001 4:53:54 PM PST by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: arete
As I have heard it, a dirty bomb is a nuke that leaves a lot of radioactive material laying around.

Technically you are correct, but that implies either a crude device or one engineered to do this. I'm pretty sure what Fox is talking about is a radiological bomb. Sure hope they are wrong, or better yet that we catch it before it goes off...it would be nice to have a real success in this war.

68 posted on 10/30/2001 4:57:57 PM PST by 6ppc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: arete
I do believe that there is some confusion over the terms."

Unlike anthrax we can definitely say these kind of bombs are "weaponized."

92 posted on 10/30/2001 5:10:01 PM PST by Boss_Jim_Gettys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson