I would like to see you try. Why don't you illustrate some of the "problems" for us here. Please don't waste our time with your perfectly straight edge "interpretation", that one's been debunked at least twice now.
I love it when people are "experts".
Whether or not I am an expert is apparently irrelevant to you because you seem unwilling to consider contrary opinions and observations. I will tell you I can be wrong, because this is called photo interpretation. That means you can be wrong too. I can tell you with some authority that this photo appears altered, and thus its AUTHENTICITY can logically be called into question.
No one has "debunked" the straight line issue, only responded with their own interpretation, so hold on to your keyboard. This is a discussion forum. I suggest you track the discussion I had with a FReeper named Truth Addict. (we coverd a lot more issues than just one element in question. Without name calling, we covered this back and forth pretty well, then agreed on where we agree and disagree on interpreting what we see. We both agree the photo has been altered, but disagree on its authenticity. We also BOTH know that without seeing the original photo negative or jpeg, we cannot KNOW.
So go drink a little less coffee and lighten up.
Why don't you tell this forum what you are really angry about. AND get off my a$$.