Replies

Believe what you wish. I believe what I see is readily identifiable as an altered photo.

To tell the truth, I read NOTHING of the article associated with the post. It did not interest me. My only point to you guys is that the photo has numerous characteristics and artifacts that make it blatantly apparent.

MY level of expertise in graphic arts, photo interpretation and manipulation will remain a secret to you because you have no need to know.

Like I said before, believe what you want to. You will anyway.

You are still full of it. Go on and pretend to be a "graphics" expert, and blow it out your nose. The photo is undoctored only digitized and you can't back up your claims at all.

I would like to see you try. Why don't you illustrate some of the "problems" for us here. Please don't waste our time with your perfectly straight edge "interpretation", that one's been debunked at least twice now.

I love it when people are "experts".