The American Red Cross yesterday acknowledged that some of the $550 million in donations to a special fund established for the victims of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks will be used for other broad-based needs instead. Posted on 10/30/2001 1:26:09 AM PST by 2Trievers
The American Red Cross yesterday acknowledged that some of the $550 million in donations to a special fund established for the victims of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks will be used for other broad-based needs instead.
“It takes a lot of money to do a lot of work. We believe very much that we are honoring donor intent,” Red Cross spokesman Mitch Hibbs said. “Yes, we are helping the families, but we’re also helping everyone else.”
Soon after the attacks, the Red Cross took the unusual step of creating a special account, the Liberty Fund, that was designated for terrorism relief efforts.
But a portion of that money will go to broad-based activities such as a blood reserve program, a national outreach effort, and a telecommunications upgrade.
In any disaster relief operation, a portion of the money raised goes toward the entire cost of the operation, not just victim relief, said Steve Monier, director of emergency services for the Greater Manchester chapter of the Red Cross.
“What we’re doing in terms of disaster relief is not new. What’s different here is the sheer magnitude of it,” Monier said.
The nine Red Cross chapters in New Hampshire have raised approximately $1.5 million for the Liberty Fund, Monier said.
That includes $1 million raised in a telethon hosted by WMUR-TV and two banks, he said.
Philanthropic watchdogs, while careful to note the Red Cross meets high standards overall, said the group has not clearly publicized its distribution plans for the Liberty Fund. They also questioned the need for a separate collection effort in the first place.
“I wish they hadn’t set up that separate fund,” said Daniel Borochoff, president of the American Institute of Philanthropy, a watchdog group based in Bethesda, Md. By doing so, Borochoff said, the Red Cross may have created unrealistic expectations that all donations would go directly to victims of the Sept. 11 attacks.
“We’ve begun to receive inquiries from the public raising questions about the distributions of 9-11 funds,” said Bennett Weiner, a spokesman for the Better Business Bureau Wise Giving Alliance, in Arlington, Va. “I think the public certainly expects the 9-11 relief organizations to follow through” by helping the victims of the attacks.
Donations to the Red Cross typically go into its Disaster Relief Fund, a general account designed to meet emergencies of all types. But soon after the Sept. 11 attacks, Red Cross President Bernadine Healy created the Liberty Fund as a special account targeted for victims of the attacks.
Disputes between Healy and members of the Red Cross board of directors over creation of the account and the uses of the money were among the issues that led to her resignation on Friday. In announcing her resignation, she disputed a statement by Red Cross Chairman David McLaughlin that the board did not force her out of her job.
“I strongly oppose commingling of the monies with any other Red Cross disaster funds. Reasonable people can differ,” Healy said last week.
Borochoff said the Red Cross still receives an “A” rating from his group but needs to be more specific with plans for the money it has raised since the tragedy, rather than appearing to use the crisis “as a way to get money for more general purposes.”
Fundraising for the Liberty Fund has been so successful that the Red Cross expects to close out the effort, though no date has been set.
Of the $550 million pledged so far, Hibbs said, the Red Cross expects to spend more than $300 million over the next several months on disaster relief related to the attacks.
In particular, $100 million has been set aside for its Family Gift program, which provides victims’ families with money to help cover immediate expenses.
Average gifts were $18,500; the maximum allowed is $30,000.
Another $100 million will go to disaster relief services in New York City, Washington, Pennsylvania and other sites. That includes meals, shelter, counseling, child-care and relocation assistance.
Other spending decisions have raised some questions.
The Liberty Fund will be tapped for $50 million for a blood readiness and reserve program that would increase the group’s blood inventory from two or three days to 10 days, and $26 million in nationwide community outreach.
Hibbs said an additional $29 million would be spent on relief infrastructure, including telecommunications, information systems, database management, contribution processing and other overhead costs.
The latest available figures — for Oct. 19 — show that $356 million has actually been collected for the Liberty Fund so far and $121.3 million spent.
Yes, folks, Red Crescent, the version of the Red Cross that operates in Muslim countries, was refusing to be part of anything that Israel was also part of - and it was getting its way. To my knowledge, the American Red Cross has still not paid its dues to that corrupt, agenda-promoting International Red Cross, and it was because of Healy's principled stand that they didn't.
should read:
“Yes, we are helping the families, but we’re also helping ourselves.”
In God We Trust.....Semper Fi
I believe that the Red Cross international ties had something to do with it. Maybe some seniors, or historians, could add the story. I think that it had to do with charging for food.
I'm retelling this from off the top of my head, but what I recall reading was that in England, the UK Red Cross charged for doughnuts and coffee, and that the American Red Cross decided to follow the lead of the RC in the host country.
The story is out on the web and can be found via websearch.
I believe they are all crooks in these "Charity" organizations,the Money is too tempting.
They believe too much in the old addage" charity begins at home.
Tha Salvation Army. They were first on the ground in both NY and DC feeding the workers. They were also the first allowed to do grief counseling. They have been evaluated by oversight groups and always receive the highest evaluations. Almost all of the funds go to those in need. Very little goes for administrative costs. It's a great organization.
Also, the one lady who lost her two kids (I think last name was Smith) was on TV about everyday telling those who would listen that the Red Cross was opening mail addressed to her but sent through the Red Cross(because noone knew her address). They were taking the money out then sending her the letter. The RC claimed the money was intended for "their" charity fund not the person the letter was intended for.
I'll wait on judging her morals and scruples until I find out how much her Golden Parachute is going to amount to.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.