Skip to comments.
I'M QUEER, I'M CONSERVATIVE...(A lesson in political correctness)
http://www.etherzone.com/port110201.shtml ^
| November 2, 2001
| Nathan Porter
Posted on 10/27/2001 6:56:49 PM PDT by Curly007
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-164 next last
Watch, someone will come out and say that the Navy should ban those guys to write messages on bombs
1
posted on
10/27/2001 6:56:49 PM PDT
by
Curly007
To: Curly007
I'M QUEER, I'M CONSERVATIVE... AND I'M IN YOUR FACE!Why is it that he has to be in my face? Pushing the fact he likes anal sex is not going to do anything but turn my stomach. I don't want to know what titillates him.
2
posted on
10/27/2001 7:03:55 PM PDT
by
JMJ333
To: Curly007
I'm still trying to find out when " gay" became an adjective for a homosexual and not a description of a good time or a happy persona.
3
posted on
10/27/2001 7:06:21 PM PDT
by
Renegade
To: Curly007
"Watch, someone will come out and say that the Navy should ban those guys to write messages on bombs." Only the fags, Nathan, only the fags.
To: Curly007
Personally speaking ,I likes the ladies .
To: JMJ333
Perhaps you should read the article
6
posted on
10/27/2001 7:08:37 PM PDT
by
Curly007
To: Curly007
I did, and I thought it was stupid.
7
posted on
10/27/2001 7:11:47 PM PDT
by
JMJ333
To: Curly007
I in no way agree with the gay lifestyle or the gay activists agenda and I've been burned before by these so called gay conservatives, however, this guy makes a good point.
That said.....to all you gay people who are going to read this column.....leave the Boy Scouts alone. Don't you believe in "freedom of association"? Leave school kids alone. Stop proselytizing to school kids. PICK ON SOMEONE YOUR OWN SIZE. It's an adult subject and should dealt with by adults.
To: Curly007
thanks for the warning...
To: Curly007
well - that's my thought, too. Pleased to see someone else agreed....thought I had read it wrong....
10
posted on
10/27/2001 7:15:45 PM PDT
by
SandyEgo
To: JMJ333
Gay conservative.
I always wonder what the appeal is in having your sexual behavior tacked onto your social, political, and professional titles.
I guess I would be a "breast-man Republican". Weird.
11
posted on
10/27/2001 7:17:15 PM PDT
by
Arkinsaw
To: JMJ333
You didn't read it, protestations to the contrary. If you did, you would realize how friggin dumb your response was.
Don't say "I read it" when you haven't.
That is known as Lying. Stop doing it.
To: Curly007
What a great read!!!!!! The guy is right on!!!
Unfortunately, I'm afraid that some will not take this as it is meant nor understand by whom it is written.
13
posted on
10/27/2001 7:19:20 PM PDT
by
Gabz
To: Curly007
"There is no written Defense Department guidance governing spontaneous acts of penmanship by our fighting forces. We do, however, expect oversight and leadership on the scene to ensure such actions are appropriate." "We train young men to drop fire on people, but we won't let them write 'F#CK' on their airplanes -- because it's obscene!"
-- Colonel Kurtz, in "Apocalypse Now"
To: JMJ333
I guess Nathan Porter must have served in
THE GAY BRIGADE.
I supposed he trained at a certain fort in New Jersey ,but decency will not let me give the name of that facility.
To: Gabz
I guess I was right.
16
posted on
10/27/2001 7:21:41 PM PDT
by
Gabz
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: Alberta's Child
Great comment....
but perhaps a spell check would have been useful here in this case..."High Jack"? instead of Hijack? We should be more upset about that...flaming loses it's force when spelled wrong.
18
posted on
10/27/2001 7:25:33 PM PDT
by
SandyEgo
To: Captain Shady
Ya know, you're being incredibly lazy or you're just unable to read
ALL THE WAY THROUGH.
He said:"When I acknowledge being a fag, gay, queer conservative I admit nothing more than being a hardworking, merry, lighthearted, odd person who seeks to preserve established traditions."
He is NOT saying he's a homosexual.
He's compaining about the REDEFINITION of perfectly normal English words for political points.
Geez. Do you guys need me to read everything for you and explain it as well?
To: Curly007
You'll have to understand that I choose not to read your post.
When it's author is at the point where he is operating so far outside the bounds of nature....it can in no way prosper me to allow myself to become familiar with his thought process.
Undoubtedly he would twist me into a homophobe but I would liken it more to...
I wouldnt drink a glass of dirty water, so why would I put someone elses filthy thoughts and perspectives into my mind?
"So you can understand."
Please. Understanding is overrated. And far too often has been rewritten to mean removing judgement based on reality.
I understand just fine.
I understand that you intentionally lack respect for God.
I understand that you have intentionally exchanged the truth for a lie because you dont like the truth.
I wouldnt sit here and read some self-proclaiming post from some Taliban loser, why would I read yours?
That's Conservative.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-164 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson