Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia offers new radio frequency weapons
Bloomberg - copied/pasted - no url | 10/25/01

Posted on 10/25/2001 7:20:19 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker

MOSCOW, Oct. 25 /CNW/ - At the recent Malaysia's Maritime and Aerospace Exhibition LIMA 2001, Russia presented two radio frequency weapons, the Ranets-E and the Rosa-E.

Analysts view them as a completely new type of electronic warfare weapons, which are being developed by leading world nations now. These arms are expected to bring electronic and information warfare to an entirely new level.

Ranets-E and Rosa-E represent non-flying weapon systems, which have been developed by Russian researchers since the late 1990s. State arms exporter Rosoboronexport, which was then called Rosvooruzheniye, initiated the export- oriented research on the creation of radio frequency arms, based on new physics principles and Russian know-how. The research has been based on the assumption that it is possible to disable not only pointing systems of high precision arms, but also their electric circuits by generating certain levels of electromagnetic radiation.

Research has been carried out on many of the new variety of radio frequency weapons projects. The cooperation between the state arms exporter and military researchers resulted in the preparation of two commercially oriented projects, Ranets-E and Rosa-E, which can be offered to potential clients.

The Ranets-E project involves the creation of a mobile radio frequency defense system against high precision weapons. The system consists of an antenna system, a high-capacity power generator, control and measuring equipment, and an energy supply sub-system. Ranets-E can be installed on a stationary or mobile base.

Its output capacity exceeds 500 megawatts; Ranets-E works in the centimeter wave frequency-range and produces impulses of 10-20 nanoseconds. Ranets-E radio frequency cannon is capable of incapacitating an enemy's high precision weapons in a radius of 10 kilometers and ensuring all around defense in a 60-degree-angle sector. The system is expected to disable missiles' pointing and electric systems.

The high capacity interference station Rosa-E is designed to bring down enemy's radar systems. It has a range of 500 kilometers. Rosa-E can be installed in an aircraft when produced in a modified casing weighing 600-1,500 kilograms. Rosa-E's input capacity is 50-100 kilowatts, its output capacity is 5-10 kilowatts. Rosa-E also works in the centimeter wave frequency range.

Clients may not purchase a finished product or the technical documentation of either model. Potential customers need to clearly define their tactical and technical preferences as well as finance the Russian researchers' and producers' work. After this, their request will be accepted or denied. If accepted, they can receive a model after concluding a special agreement. The model can be tested at a military range.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Pearls Before Swine
Targeting systems aside -
consider the number of circuits used in just about anything we use today,
including those nifty hummers,
and this gizmo might be real meaningful.

PS: The Soviets have been working on stuff like this for years and years, they liked to play in sciences that we tend to ignore.

21 posted on 10/25/2001 10:10:46 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: the crow
Thanks for the ping. Yes, of course I'm interested. I have written two articles on the subject of EMP weaponry (last year) and gotten nothing but "tin hat" ridicule from many of the freepers.

The U.S. probably has even more advanced EMP weapons. When put into space they are a much more reliable anti-missile shield than the ground based trying to hit a bullet(rocket) with another bullet.

We are in an entirely new age of weaponry and I'm sure the military is just itching to try them out in Afghanistan.

22 posted on 10/25/2001 1:16:28 PM PDT by Medium Rare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
1) Most major weapons systems are extensively "hardened" against EMF interference. The weapons at risk are the COTS, handheld, "Army of One" type stuff.

2) The biggest problem with these things is that they are not true focused beam weapons and tend to mess up your own electronics if anywhere near the emitter.

23 posted on 10/25/2001 1:28:56 PM PDT by NY.SS-Bar9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Medium Rare
No "tin hat" pings from me, MR, altho I readily understand. I tuned into this a number of years ago; most people have no clue what you are talking about.

Remember 'too stupid to quit' is a legitimate strategy.

How about reciprocal pinging on this topic? I suspect it will be of greater interest in the not too distant future. Sooner if the ragheads had anything to take out...

24 posted on 10/25/2001 9:54:58 PM PDT by the crow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: NativeNewYorker
Death Ray?

Fiddlestix,why,it doesn't even slow them up!

26 posted on 10/26/2001 4:00:40 PM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68; *taliban_list
Will it work in caves?
27 posted on 10/30/2001 10:34:58 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson