Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: katze
In the '96-'97 time frame, about 99% of the general populace and the main stream media gave no credence or plausibility to any China/Clinton utterings.

If you published reports then, you were considered a conspiracy nut. Even in '99 the medias(mainstream) didn't want to discuss any VRWC non-sense without solid, sourced proof.

Even today it's considered as some stupid dream chased by Xlin-Ton haters. After all....If anything of substance was evident the DOJ(Reno or Ashcroft) would have prosecuted such a heinous act. It's still in tin-foil territory my friend as far as the "in-the-know" beltway people are concerned.

Me? - I have a different opinion.

72 posted on 10/24/2001 5:58:41 PM PDT by martian_22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: martian_22; Jim Robinson
"In the '96-'97 time frame, about 99% of the general populace and the main stream media gave no credence or plausibility to any China/Clinton utterings."

You're quite wrong, and that is why I've flagged JimRob, as I'm sure he remembers all the articles published by the media and posted right here, when FR was very young. If you don't believe me, perhaps you might ask him yourself. The LA Times was particularly tough on what went on with the '96 election. The Wash Post still has a database, as well. The issue is, some of us cared enough to study what took place and brought it up for review and discussion. Some of the articles are likely in my old laptop; perhaps I'll check one day when I have time; I'm working for a couple more weeks, then if you want to remind me.......

73 posted on 10/24/2001 6:16:03 PM PDT by katze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson