Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will the War Kill the Bill of Rights?
Cato Institute ^ | October 18, 2001 | David Kopel

Posted on 10/23/2001 8:48:28 AM PDT by sendtoscott

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last
To: Reagan Man
Ronald Reagan and Reagan Man both know that it's not called the Bill of Rights for nothing bucko.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,

Now, boys and girls, let's review:

1. The People have unalienable rights endowed by their creator.

2. Governments have just powers (NOT rights) derived from the consent of the governed. These powers can NEVER legitimately infringe upon unalienable rights.

Now for a bonus question: Which political party holds that rights are a gift from their government and change with the fickle whim of the majority?

61 posted on 10/23/2001 1:13:13 PM PDT by freeeee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
Does the Constitution mean anything to 'conservatives' anymore?

Unfortunately, 'conservatives,' just like liberals, only follow the Constitution when it's convenient.

The people who built this country wrongly assumed that the generations who would follow them would be of the same character as they themselves were. They were gravely mistaken.

62 posted on 10/23/2001 1:13:19 PM PDT by Jefferson Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
I have found that those who make quick comparisons to Hitler, Mao, Stalin, et al actually know very little about Hitler, Mao, Stalin, et al.

Agreed.

63 posted on 10/23/2001 1:21:13 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Jefferson Adams
Unfortunately, 'conservatives,' just like liberals, only follow the Constitution when it's convenient.

That has never been more painfully evident than since last month.

The people who built this country wrongly assumed that the generations who would follow them would be of the same character as they themselves were. They were gravely mistaken.

I'm beginning to think they wasted their time, blood, sweat and tears on us. Most of the sheeple in this country aren't worth their sacrifice.

If I could travel back in time to speak with the Founders, I wouldn't know whether to warn them how the Constitution would be ignored and misconstrued, or to tell them not to bother writing a Constitution at all - go back to the pub and have another one because in the end no one really wants a Constitutional Republic.

64 posted on 10/23/2001 1:22:19 PM PDT by freeeee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
Take a course in reading comprehension before you attempt to take others to task over something you are obviously inadequately prepared to understand and defend.

My remark was about the Bill of Rights and not about the that part of the Constitution that states, "unalienable Rights... of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness". Big difference.

65 posted on 10/23/2001 1:38:05 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Jefferson Adams
It has gotten way beyond sad, my friend, and most people have absolutly NO conception of the freedoms that we have already given up just during the last TWO generations.

As you have already pointed out, our tax burden to support mandates and organizations that are unconstitutional have grown astronomically while our personal freedoms, liberties and responsibilities have shrunk proportionally while too many people have been asleep at the switch. My father used to say that things could always be changed at the ballot box, however, I don't see much of an option for that happening during the last couple of decades. I find myself having to vote for the lesser of two evils and, as we all know, the lesser of two evils is still evil.

Keep well.

66 posted on 10/23/2001 1:40:20 PM PDT by KentuckyWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
First, let's clarify your position: According to you, what is the origin of rights? Is it the government - hence the Bill of Rights grants rights that can be revoked by government?

Or do rights come from someplace else?

67 posted on 10/23/2001 1:43:02 PM PDT by freeeee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Jefferson Adams
Herein lies the reason that REAL history isn't taught in the public indoctrination centers any more. Can't have the sheep knowing that this Country was founded to break free from a government that was less intrusive and less expensive than the one we live under today.
68 posted on 10/23/2001 1:43:09 PM PDT by KentuckyWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Hey, bucko.

If you think that the "Bill of Rights" grants those rights, then you are totally clueless.

A cursory examination of the debates leading up to the formulation of the Bill of Rights will show that the staunchest defenders of rights were totally opposed to their drafting. This is due to the fact that they believed that people would think that those rights emanated from the document, and could thus be compromised away by successive generations.

I guess that this thread proves that they were correct.

You still need to change your screen name, bucko, and you continue to dishonor the esteemed name of Ronald Reagan.

69 posted on 10/23/2001 1:46:31 PM PDT by Jerry_M
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Petronski; Reagan Man
Read Reagan Man's "contributions" to this thread. Then tell me with a straight face that he is closer to Ronald Reagan than Stalin, Mao, or Hitler.
70 posted on 10/23/2001 1:47:47 PM PDT by Jerry_M
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man; freeeee
A proud product of "publick edjumacation". God help us.
71 posted on 10/23/2001 1:52:33 PM PDT by Jerry_M
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man; freeeee
"Take a course in reading comprehension...

I wanted to suggest that you take a "basic civics" course, but then I remembered that they don't teach such a thing anymore. Is it any wonder that one who would call himself "Reagan Man" would spout such inanities and not see just how far from RR's position he really is. A sign of just how bad things have gotten in our "young citizen indoctrination centers" when someone who thinks that he is emulating Ronald Reagan is actually 180 degrees opposed.

72 posted on 10/23/2001 1:58:15 PM PDT by Jerry_M
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Jerry_M
A proud product of "publick edjumacation". God help us.

That's no excuse. I had a "publick edjumacation" too.

73 posted on 10/23/2001 2:02:41 PM PDT by freeeee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Jerry_M
It obvious, when the time came to hand out brains, the good Lord passed you over. You should change your screen name to "Rainman", or "Forrest Gump". LMAO
74 posted on 10/23/2001 2:06:49 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
Yes, but I doubt that you are "proud" of it.

Unless I miss the mark altogether, you have had to do quite a bit to undue the damage.

(In other words, the educated among us know that they are responsible for the results.)

75 posted on 10/23/2001 2:08:24 PM PDT by Jerry_M
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Insults are always a good tactic to fall back on when your logic fails. Did you learn that in the same school that taught you that your unalienable rights come from the Bill of Rights?
76 posted on 10/23/2001 2:09:51 PM PDT by Jerry_M
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
"Our natural unalienable rights are now presumed to be a dispensation of government, divisible by a vote of the majority. The greatest good for the greatest number is a high-sounding phrase but contrary to the very basis of our Nation, unless it is accompanied by the recognition that we have certain rights which cannot be infringed upon, even if the individual stands outvoted by all of his fellow citizens. Without this recognition, majority rule is nothing more then mob rule." —Ronald Reagan, A Time for Choosing (Oct. 27, 1964)
77 posted on 10/23/2001 2:17:10 PM PDT by Jerry_M
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
My remark was about the Bill of Rights and not about the that part of the Constitution that states, "unalienable Rights... of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness". Big difference.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

From where do you believe rights originate?

78 posted on 10/23/2001 2:18:34 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Jerry_M
Insults are always a good tactic to fall back on when your logic fails. Did you learn that in the same school that taught you that your unalienable rights come from the Bill of Rights?

You started the name calling bozo. So by your own standards, your logic has failed. And I never said "unalienable rights come from the Bill of Rights", clown man. You need to get a grip on reality. The best place to start is to get off of whatever drugs your on. Get clean and then join us good folks in the human race. From your incoherent rhetoric, it's clear that won't be easy for you. So start early.

Remember, God helps those, who help themselves. Start helping yourself out. A mind is a terrible thing to waste. From reading your blatherings, you've been wasting your mind for far too long.

79 posted on 10/23/2001 2:20:17 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Jerry_M; Reagan Man
Nice quote! Oh, Reagan Man what do you think of that one?
80 posted on 10/23/2001 2:21:40 PM PDT by freeeee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson