Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where is the Foxnews video feed????
Self ^ | 10-22-01 | Jon

Posted on 10/22/2001 5:13:30 AM PDT by Martyboy1

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:31:27 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

What happened to the Foxnews video feed of the Foxnews Channel? I used to have it, but it's been awhile since I've used it and it doesn't work now. I saw someone on here post the following link recently, but I couldn't get it to work either...it just says the page cannot be found: http://www.foxnews.com/newsnow/video/fnchi.rmm I'd prefer the Real Player feed. I have problems with Windows Media Player loosing connectivity here at work. Please help!...post the new link for the Real Player feed!


(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/22/2001 5:13:30 AM PDT by Martyboy1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Martyboy1
They dont supply it any longer. Ads rights and all. There is Sky News though....I would view them if you want good quality feed. Here
2 posted on 10/22/2001 5:16:35 AM PDT by smith288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Martyboy1
fox nixed that deal 6-9?? months ago. it something to do with
people not getting paid for all of the 'homes' that the stream was sent to.
i have emailed them several times asking if they will have a stream
for a monthly fee in the future. they have never replied.
you might drop them a note, maybe if enough letters are collected
they will change their mind.
3 posted on 10/22/2001 5:17:33 AM PDT by tamu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Martyboy1
There is none on the web. Contractural restrictions apparently. Once in a while, a feed is available from 'Sky News' HERE, but that is not alive now, and I don't know what, if any, is scheduled.
4 posted on 10/22/2001 5:18:06 AM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tamu
Sounds like free advertising to me... Was it Fox that wanted the money of the advertisers?
5 posted on 10/22/2001 5:18:15 AM PDT by smith288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: smith288
the advertisers, of course.
6 posted on 10/22/2001 5:23:51 AM PDT by callisto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: callisto
That makes no sense....Fox puts free advertising into homes and they want fox to pay them for it? What the hell kind of marketing is that? I would love to get a network like fox to push my product for free. Maybe im just ignorant of the business
7 posted on 10/22/2001 5:43:29 AM PDT by smith288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: smith288
It might have been that the actors that performed in the ads wanted additional royalties. That's what happed to Jim Quinn in Pittsburgh. They solved the problem by cutting out the ads on the live radio feed.
8 posted on 10/22/2001 5:52:23 AM PDT by Jaxter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Martyboy1
Everything is changing from day to day. I use to like to listen to the ballgames and other programs.

It seems every day there are new changes to the 'Real Player.'

It's money now, nothing more! I stay away from anything that has to do with sound or video.

Maybe somebody may be able to enlighten me?

9 posted on 10/22/2001 6:06:31 AM PDT by lute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lute
yea..its all money money money. It cost next to nothing to stream the broadcast...just the legal issues i guess.
10 posted on 10/22/2001 6:11:13 AM PDT by smith288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: smith288
If I remember correctly, at first most every radio and TV streamed online was stopped until some kind of deal could be reached. Some stations no longer stream at all now, although I'm hard-pressed to understand the logic in not wanting your product advertised for free. Maybe it involved the programs that were airing and the producers didn't want their show carried for free into any home....NOW THAT MAKES A LOT OF SINCE, DOESN'T IT? Anyway I look at this I just don't get it unless Time-Warner was involved and wanted people to pay more like with cable. But, h*ll they get your $$$ as an ISP...so who knows. The logic that exists in the business world today is often not understandable.

If anyone remembers the story to this please post it.

11 posted on 10/22/2001 6:31:20 AM PDT by callisto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jaxter
you're right. i had forgotten the specifics, but it was the ad actors
who thru a wrench into the whole works. too bad.
12 posted on 10/22/2001 7:02:16 AM PDT by tamu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Martyboy1
Try searching for Fox News.
13 posted on 10/22/2001 9:26:27 AM PDT by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson