The Solution to ending terrorism in America is:
(1)Deporting and or arresting all illegal alien immigrants and all individuals (mostly foriegners) in America linked to terror groups.
(2)And rearming our pilots as they were before the evil 1968 gun Control Act was passed. The evil law was by crooked politicians over one mass shooting in Texas brought on by a shooter who was heavily on pychotropic drugs and under psychiatric care/experimentation when he commited his mass murders. And for 30 years the record was sealed and keep secret, while the FBI bold faced lied for over 30 years that on Aug. 1, 1966, sniper Charles Joseph Whitman was not on psychiatric or pschotropic mind altering drugs.
Once the FBI and government was finally forced to release the record is was clear that Whitman was on pschotropic mind altering drugs and under psychiatric , as have most of the mass random shooters since 1966 that have been used to passed gun control.
(3)Repealing the 1968 Gun Control Act
(4)Most importantly the solution is not passing any new anti-terror laws which violate our God given, Bill of Rights protected rights and freedoms as Americans!
Giving up our rights only increases our chances of becoming victims of terror by enemies--foriegn and domestic enemies.
Don't allow the government to continue allowing terrorism to take place(by not taking proper action to stop it) and use it to take away your rights, and use it to arm your enemies(China & Russia).
I'm disappointed Bush went to see the CHI-COMS after the spy plane incident. They are NO FRIENDS of ours...
October 20, 2001
SUMMIT
Frustrating U.S., China Balks at Pact to Stem Nuclear Sales
By CRAIG S. SMITH
HANGHAI, Oct. 19 — President Bush and President Jiang Zemin celebrated warming relations between their two countries today, but behind the smiles little of substance has yet changed.
In particular, the two sides remain in a standoff over implementation of a nonproliferation agreement signed nearly a year ago. The Bush administration had hoped that action on the issue would be the one concrete achievement the president could announce at the summit meeting today.
Yet despite what one senior administration official called a "full- court press" in the weeks leading up to today's meeting, China would not agree to what the United States considered a relatively simple deal. Chinese government officials could not be reached for comment, but American officials and Chinese arms control experts suggested that Beijing might want further concessions from the United States.
The lack of progress has frustrated administration officials, who said today that stopping the proliferation of nuclear weapons and the missiles designed to deliver them is more important than ever.
Most of China's exports of nuclear weapons technology and missile- making equipment have gone to Pakistan, where simmering Islamic fundamentalism raises the concern that such technology could someday fall into the hands of extremists in the region. Pakistan relies largely on China for its weapons, which China has been willing to sell because it has helped create a counterbalance to India, with which China has longstanding territorial disputes.
But the American-Pakistan alliance formed after the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States promises to reduce Pakistan's military dependence on China, at a time when China itself has begun to worry about the nuclear weapons program in what is a potentially unstable country.
This would seem to be an especially opportune time for China to follow through on its year-old nonproliferation agreement. That it has not underscores how the outlines of United States-China relations remain largely unaltered beyond Beijing's expressions of support for the American antiterrorism campaign.
"Despite the improved atmosphere, there remain a number of concrete areas in U.S.-China relations that won't be affected by the current cooperation against terrorism, such as missile defense, Taiwan and evidently nonproliferation," said David Shambaugh, director of the China Policy Program at George Washington University in Washington.
The Bush administration wanted China to fulfill its November 2000 agreement today by handing over a list of missile parts and missile-making technology that it would ban from export to third countries, like Pakistan. As part of that agreement, China is also required to show how it would enforce such a ban.
In return, the United States promised to allow American businesses to resume launching satellites on Chinese rockets, a lucrative business for China that the United States has blocked since February 2000 because of the proliferation concerns.
Fulfillment of the accord was initially held up by the change of administrations at the beginning of this year and then by the crisis caused by the collision of an American surveillance plane with a Chinese fighter jet off China's southern coast in April.
In July, the United States formally complained about China's failure to follow through on the agreement, and experts from the two sides have met several times since then to try and resolve the issue. By last week, administration officials were saying that they expected a deal in time for today's meeting between Mr. Bush and Mr. Jiang. But by the end of last week, the talks had broken down. It is not entirely clear why.
China has threatened in the past to use proliferation to punish the United States for its arms sales to Taiwan or for the deployment of Washington's proposed missile defense shield.
China has made various nonproliferation commitments since it began raising alarm in the early 1990's with its sales of nuclear weapons technology, missiles and missile technology, but adhered to nobe of them. In June 1991, Mr. Bush's father barred the export of supercomputers, satellites and missile technology to China to punish it for transferring missile technology to Pakistan. Those sanctions were waived in March 1992. But a little more than a year later, the Clinton administration imposed new sanctions on China for again shipping missile equipment to Pakistan.
In November 1994, the United States waived the sanctions yet again after China signed a statement vowing not to export missiles capable of delivering a 1,100-pound warhead 180 miles or more. By the late 1990's, though, it became clear that China had shipped such missiles, called M-11's, to Pakistan.
Last November, the Clinton administration imposed sanctions for those sales. But it waived the sanctions in return for an agreement under which China would give the United States a list of missile components and technology that it promised not to export, and would explain how it planned to enforce the ban.
The Chinese never provided that list or the explanation and the United States says that earlier this year, the China Metallurgical Equipment Corporation delivered components for Pakistani two-stage, solid-fuel missiles. The United States warned China that it would again face sanctions if it did not carry out the 2000 agreement, but nothing was done.
On Sept. 1, the State Department imposed sanctions against the Chinese company and its Pakistani counterpart. The sanctions have the effect of once again blocking American companies from launching satellites on Chinese rockets.
The current sanctions are all the more galling for the Chinese because the United States has since lifted the companion sanctions against Pakistan's National Development Complex, the entity that the United States says received the Chinese missile parts. Those sanctions were lifted to encourage Pakistan's cooperation in the war in Afghanistan.
China has said that its own extensive investigation found that the Chinese company had not sold missile parts. It has said it will not carry out the November agreement until the new sanctions are lifted.
"Technically there should be no difficulty in making the list available, but politically China needs a U.S. quid pro quo," said Shen Dingli, an America-watcher at Fudan University in Shanghai.
I don't think bushtheyounger is going to do anything about illegal immigration as his buddy fox seems to be writing U.S. immigration reform laws.
I don't agree with you about deportations. As far as I'm concerned, the way America treats immigrants from China shouldn't be any of Zemin's business. Protecting everyone in our borders is the U.S. government's responsibility and persecuting everyone in China's borders is Zemin's responsibility, but what in the ^(&@# is Bush trying to prove by getting on gushy with Red China of all places? We should be getting purely verifiable concessions from them in any matter, and we should not play into their hands while doing it.
Who will be getting the superior military intelligence? Wake up GW.
Puts me to think of the saying "keep your friends close and your enemies closer".
