[BeAChooser]

Do you seriously believe a thing that Judicial Watch puts out?

Actually I do, especially when it comes to their work during the Clinton years. Over and over they discovered criminal activities when NOONE else was even looking. In fact, it is only because of Judicial Watch's efforts that we know about Chinagate. Their efforts in Filegate were also very important. I challenge you to show that Klayman lied in either of those instances in any press release he issued. Prove that Klayman was unreliable during this timeframe. Otherwise, we might be forced to wonder why you are so interested in smearing Chung while making Brown out to be something that he definitely was not.

Now if they had a copy of her deposition where Nolanda Hill is actually on record saying this, I would find that very pursuasive. Get me that and I'll print off this thread and eat it.

What? Are you suggesting that Judicial Watch did not file the petition as their press report states? Well they did ... at least according to WorldNetDaily on THURSDAY FEBRUARY 12 1998. Go look it up. And if Klayman's petition contained a lie then don't you think that three-judge panel would have severely repremanded him? Lawyers are not supposed to knowingly lie you know. Sounds to me like you just don't like Klayman or Judicial Watch. I wonder why. Maybe for the same reason you don't like Chung. And for the record, the statement that Nolanda testified that Brown told Clinton he intended to enter a plea agreement with the federal prosecutor and testify against the Administration was also carried by Ruddy (Newsmax). But then you STILL haven't bothered to look through any of the sources I provided, have you?

[ALOHA RONNIE]

...LARRY KLAYMAN stated many times on Talk Radio at the time that a Multi-Investigation Targeted RON BROWN died just after he had informed BILL CLINTON in the Oval Office that he was not going to take a Fall for him =

...A Sudden One-Way Trip to Bosnia

[Landru]

"And if Klayman's petition contained a lie then don't you think that three-judge panel would have severely repremanded him? Lawyers are not supposed to knowingly lie you know. Sounds to me like you just don't like Klayman or Judicial Watch. I wonder why. Maybe for the same reason you don't like Chung."

Someone had to ask that.
Frankly, in following this exchange I'd begun wondering the same thing(s) concerning this person's tack myself.

[VA Advogado]

What? Are you suggesting that Judicial Watch did not file the petition as their press report states? Well they did ... at least according to WorldNetDaily on THURSDAY FEBRUARY 12 1998.

No, I am suggesting that you have made an assertion and haven't backed it up with a primary sourced document - Hill's deposition. I am trying to cut through the JW clutter and go to a reliable source for your claim. I don't trust secondary sources, particularly Judical Watch.

[VA Advogado]

Just as I suspected. This statement of Nolanda Hill not only doesn't state that Ron Brown was going to rat out the Clinton administration, it shows that despite her pleadings, Brown became even more aggressive in DEFENDING the Clinton administration. You see why primary sourced documents are important?

Affidavit of Nolanda Butler Hill