Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lake
America supported the KMT for several reasons and it had nothing to do with being a good dicatorship.

The KMT were not communist. They were also friendly to America. They also had democratic aims.

You seem to be misinterpreting the actual radicalness of communism and the communist party in context of the time.

There was one group called the Dixie Mission (from America) who preffered Mao though. Those people were later purged. John Paton Davies and several others were bona-fide communist sympathizers.

142 posted on 10/25/2001 11:43:00 AM PDT by super175
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: super175
>>They were also friendly to America

That's why the US supported KMT. What I mean by "good" is "friendly to America"

143 posted on 10/25/2001 12:26:58 PM PDT by Lake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

To: super175
>>several others were bona-fide communist sympathizers

The DPP in Taiwan used to be called "communist sympathizers" by KMT. After DPP took power, it started calling KMT "communist sympathizers". Sounds like "communist sympathizers" are everywhere.

144 posted on 10/25/2001 12:29:44 PM PDT by Lake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson