Posted on 10/18/2001 9:26:39 AM PDT by saminfl
One-term George
In 1992 and 1996 we elected a brilliant president who led this country to its highest potential with the best economy in this country's history. His foreign policies and hard work went far toward peace in the Middle East. Through no fault of his, it failed. He worked diligently for peace in Ireland also. As a result, he is warmly received throughout the world for his hard work toward peace, his intelligence and his caring for all people.
In 2000 we had a fraudulent election with widespread corruption by the GOP. The Supreme Court decided whom it wanted and installed him in the White House.
For the first time in our history, we have a non-elected commander in chief leading us. Voters' wishes were irrelevant and ignored, so we now have a person who knew nothing about the economy or foreign policy and had no real-world experience leading us. We have the old men from 20 years ago, Cheney and Rumsfeld, to see us through these bad times.
As Americans, we will be behind this man because of the war and the tradition of backing the commander in chief during times like these. Thankfully, though, he will be leading us for only one term and his service will be temporary.
ANITA PIERCE Fort Walton Beach
Who the heck is he talking about? All i can say, Bill is a loser. What's in the drinking water out ther in Florida? LOL,LOL. Geesh!
Crime/Corruption
Source: News Max
Published: Oct. 16, 2001 Author: Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
Posted on 10/16/01 7:01 PM Eastern by concerned about politics
A Zogby International poll released Monday afternoon shows that Americans prefer to have President Bush leading them through the current terrorist crisis over ex-president Clinton by a landslide margin of 72 percent to 20 percent.
The poll, taken in conjuction with Associated Television News, surveyed 1,011 registered voters between Oct. 8 and 10 and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.2 percent.
On Monday, Clinton was quoted as saying that he wished he was still in White House and has reportedly lamented privately that he had no major crisis, beyond his own impeachment, to shape his presidency.
Despite the Zogby survey's stunning result, the poll has received virtually no mainstream media coverage.
Sort of like her beloved Bill Clinton in 1992.
I'm just lovin FOX
It all depends on how you define the word 'brilliant'. And how you define the word 'we'.
Why does this Anita Pierce person insist on poisoning the national dialog with this kind of fraud? Because she is little more than a child, intellectually, and emotionally. Essentially, because of the viciously contentious nature of the Clinton presidency, she was forced to side with a man that initially fooled her and millions of others, in order to justify her original choice for president in '92, and to later defend the indefensible as the scandals mounted and mounted. A mature person would have begun the process of rethinking her support for this corrupt man. Certainly there were enough warning signs and clear examples of Clinton's mendacious nature to eventually make any "thinking" person doubt her original loyalties. But, a child will defend her mistakes, fib and lie to justify them to herself, while losing critical credibility that Anita seems not to value. Simply a case of a childish "fit of pique", she lacks the msturebcircumspect wisdom to admit that she was wrong. Even when it destroys her own journalistic credibility.
I'm sorry. I could read no further based on the author's exterme ignorance.
Liberal logic:
1)1992 - Winning presidential candidate gets 43% in a 3-way race = HE HAS A MANDATE TO LEAD A NEW ERA!!!
2) 2000- Winning presidential candidate gets 48% in a 3-way race = HE IS A TYRANT OF THE MINORITY!!!
NEVER try to use common-sense when explaining things to liberals.
"In 1992 and 1996 we elected a brilliant president who led this country to its highest potential with the best economy in this country's history. His foreign policies and hard work went far toward peace in the Middle East. Through no fault of his, it failed. He worked diligently for peace in Ireland also. As a result, he is warmly received throughout the world for his hard work toward peace, his intelligence and his caring for all people."
You mean to say we elected another president besides Klinton in '92 and '96??? Why didn't that guy get more press and why didn't he get to live in the White House?? <"">
Peace debate alive, civil or not
Is this the article you wanted us to read?
We kicked the first Bush out after he got the job done in the Gulf War.
It's thinkable that we will kick out Bush if he get the job done before reelection time.
Hillary vs. W, should be one heck of an election.
What jack ass wrote this idiot piece? The best economy was a lie and as for potential. There was none with the commies in charge. Hillary, Bill And Reno the killer. Just potential for 6000 deaths at the attack of America. Liberals are cry babies and need to shut up!
I saw the O'Reilly Factor for the first time last night and well as Hannity and Colmes. Colmes is one strange looking dude.
I'm probably going to come into work late tomorrow so I can see E.D Donahey on the tube for the first time. Plus FOX really has some news babes. I'm not familiar with all of them yet, but I'm sure I will be.
Like I said, I'm lovin FOX
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.