Posted on 10/17/2001 12:18:58 PM PDT by junebug54
Billy Graham - Sept 14, 2001 There is one thing about what happened (last Tuesday/Friday) that came in under the radar and escaped many Christians. For the first time in history, one man (Billy Graham) spoke the Gospel to the entire world at the same time. He gave the sermon at the National Memorial Service and was broadcast on every major television station in the U.S. and by satellite to the world.Every country in the world received this broadcast...and because it was a Geo-Political event, every leader watched and heard it translated into his/her language. Many ministers have their messages broadcast in other countries and carried around the world, but this is the first time that the entire world listened to the Gospel preached at one time. The World and All its leaders tuned in and heard the gospel. Never before has one individual preached to the leaders of the world and their country at one time.Mark 13:10 - And the Gospel must first be preached to all the nations Matthew 24:14 - And this Gospel of the King shall be preached in the whole world for a witness to all the nations and the end shall come. Romans 10 - whole chapter - particularly verse 18.One thought on this is that through Billy Graham today, Biblical prophecy was fulfilled. As we listened to him, retail stores had the entire service broadcast throughout every speaker in the store's audio system. It was on virtually every TV and radio station and people across America held hands and wept before God. Some say that the Holy Spirit came upon Billy Graham just as it did upon John the Baptist announcing the Kingdom of God is at hand. Some also believe that this is the most significant prophecy to be fulfilled since Israel became a nation in 1948. Agree or not, it was staggering to hear this. Scripture tells us often, to watch, take heed, and stay alert, for we do not know when the appointed time is.Mark 13:33. FYI
Just like Him!!!!!!
I have read and studied the bible extensively, I know what's going on around me, and yet I came to utterly different conclusions that you.
Could it have something to do with this?
Romans 1:16-32 16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ, for it is the power of God to salvation for everyone who believes, for the Jew first and also for the Greek. 17 For in it the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith; as it is written, "The just shall live by faith." 18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19 because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, 21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools, 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man--and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things. 24 Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, 25 who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen. 26 For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. 27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due. 28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers, 30 backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful; 32 who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.
Or maybe this --
2 Corinthian 11:13-15 13 For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into apostles of Christ. 14 And no wonder! For Satan himself transforms himself into an angel of light. 15 Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also transform themselves into ministers of righteousness, whose end will be according to their works.
This is great...but the prophecy states that the Gospel will be preached to the entire world...not necessarily by one man, or in one sermon.
There are countless people ministering the Gospel around the world.
So understanding the subject matter makes one an authority. I see. What if his understanding is full, but also very wrong? For example, he can say, "I know that the bible says..." but then draw all the wrong conclusions too.
In general terms, that's right. I don't know where you've been for the last few years -- but unless you haven't noticed -- there are lots of "authorities" (and recognized ones) who disagree with each other. Thus the diagreement with each other doesn't make them be "considered" any less of an authority -- even though they can be saying totally opposite things to each other.
I have to laugh at this "splitting hairs" by you (in terms of the word "authority") because anyone and their dog knows that if one were to go into a court case and call in so-called "authorities" you could practically buy any authority you wanted for any viewpoint. Thus, what you say is totally irrelevant in terms of describing the word (and term) authority.
But, having said that -- there is definitely a concern for the truth -- no matter if one is an authority or not. And I think I answered that issue (i.e., the one about "truth") in post #62. That pretty much covers the issue.
Let me also say that the "authority of the inspired word of God" is not what we're talking about here. The question was simply "What makes him an authority?"
No person is "inspired of God" today, since the cannon of Scripture is closed. Thus, the authority that resides in Scripture (which is full and complete) is not what we're talking about here in terms of "What makes a person an authority?" That's a pretty general question and gets a pretty general answer.
My general answer stands.
Perhaps -- on the other hand -- maybe what one was really asking is how we can tell a wrong interpretation of Scripture from a right one? If that's it, then it gets a different answer (which I did not address, there).
Am I being clear here? Do you see why your answer is wrong?
One more follow-up here, on that issue. Using the dictionary, when referring to words (and their meanings) is usually a good method, too. If you examine the following from Websters (and I've included it all here), you can see that the most likely candidate for the usage of the word is -- 1c
Main Entry: au·thor·i·ty Function: noun Etymology: Middle English auctorite, from Old French auctorité, from Latin auctoritat-, auctoritas opinion, decision, power, from auctor Date: 13th century 1 a (1) : a citation (as from a book or file) used in defense or support (2) : the source from which the citation is drawn b (1) : a conclusive statement or set of statements (as an official decision of a court) (2) : a decision taken as a precedent (3) : TESTIMONY c : an individual cited or appealed to as an expert 2 a : power to influence or command thought, opinion, or behavior b : freedom granted by one in authority : RIGHT 3 a : persons in command; specifically : GOVERNMENT b : a governmental agency or corporation to administer a revenue-producing public enterprise 4 a : GROUNDS, WARRANT b : convincing force
Once again, the question was what makes him an authority -- and my answer was correct, as the word is most commonly used (in his context). But, I have a feeling that this was not the true intent of the question (even though it was stated that way), you see....
Oh..., and I can imagine (with a lot of nit-pickers around here) someone is going to ask what makes him an expert, then... :-) I just happened to look it up and I think he qualifies that way, too. It was "one with the special skill or knowledge representing mastery of a particular subject." I believe Missler fits that category pretty well.
But, again, that still doesn't answer the "truth issue" in the definition. But, then I wasn't trying to answer it there.
The next event on the Scriptural calendar is the rapture of the believers. No other prophecy needs to be fulfilled before then.
Amen to that. I would agree.
HOWEVER, I would like to point out that although no "prophetic event" needs to be fulfilled to have that happen -- there are "facts on the ground" (as it is said) that need to be in place before it happens. Those "facts on the ground" are not prophetic events -- but are rather "realities of life" that need to be in place before things can come together quickly (and on time) during the 7 year Tribulation.
The question is -- how long will it take for all the "facts on the ground" to line up for the final events to take place. That's the unknown factor. We wait and see. And that is the reason why these current events are so very interesting.
Well, I hope you are right, but I am already getting old. Maybe I should find a good Christian woman before it all ends. At any rate, I am a hockey fan, and I am going to watch the Dallas Stars and St Louis Blues. Later.
Muslims may not have heard the word preached, but you can bet they all have heard of Jesus.
Also, when we get our new bodies we will remain down here on earth for a while. We will walk around with our immortal bodies before we go up to be with Jesus in the clouds. How do I know? Because Paul says, "after that [after the dead are caught up in the clouds to be with Jesus], we who are still alive will be caught up with them forever."
I seriously doubt that. It doesn't fit what it says here.
1 Thessalonians 4:15-18 15 For this we say to you by the word of the Lord, that we who are alive and remain until the coming of the Lord will by no means precede those who are asleep. 16 For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first. 17 Then we who are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And thus we shall always be with the Lord. 18 Therefore comfort one another with these words.
Look at that verse 17 -- "shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air."
Now, if I understand you right -- the Lord and the dead in Christ are going to be floating around up there "in the air" and "on hold" -- just waiting for us to finish our "vacation" down here while we walk around, enjoying our new bodies.
Wouldn't that be kinda "rude" -- dontcha think?
In addition to that -- it also does not fit the word-picture analogy of the "wedding" and the "bride of Christ" as given in post #52. Now "picture this". Here is the "new wedding analogy."
The bridegroom comes in the middle of the night with a "shout" and with his wedding party to take the bride away -- but -- the bride says "Wait a minute, while I go over to my girlfriend's house and show off my new wedding dress. Hold on and I'll be right back..." [she's just "walking around" enjoying her new wedding dress, dontcha know...]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.