Posted on 10/16/2001 11:38:36 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
Doesn't the Economist mean "Israel?"
I still remember their cover, "Sharon's Israel, the World's Worry."
The Economist hates Israel... it's a European publication, what can I say?
In Europe, Bosnian Muslims have for more than two years been brutally harried by Serbs who are theoretically Christians. On the border between Europe and Asia, Christian Armenians have thumped Muslim Azeris, admitted with rather more provocation, and Jews and Muslims still shoot each other in Palestine. Farther east, Muslims complain of the Indian army's brutality to them in Kashmir, and of Indian Hindus' destruction of the Ayodhya mosque in 1992. Such experiences tend to make Muslims think the world is against them. If it is, then they are against the world. Hence the xenophobia that gets foreigners murdered by Koran-quoting terrorists in Algeria and Egypt. Islam, as Samuel Huntington, a professor at Harvard University, has put it, has bloody borders.
Since 1994, nah, since 700 A.D. it is our fault that they are at war with their neighbours.
If Islam is not going to change, either the west has to change or islam has to live in isolation or Islam bites sand. I think, WEST and Islam will try to co-exist, if it still does not work, I am sure, West is not going to change. So to survive, either Islam will change or go dorment or even act changed for a while.
-------------------------
The Muslems were the original invaders. The Serbs have niver forgotten it or given up on attempts to expel them.
It is quite obvious that in many countries, the GDP growth is less than population growth, which means there is less money to go round than there was before.
And reviewing the table in #2, it is clear that not one nation without oil, has per capita GDP of over $2,000 pa. Not much evidence they have the "stuff" to do better. And after decades of oil, those oil rich nations bring in foreigners to do the highest and lowest tasks. It is said Saudi has 25% unemployment, yet the dirty work is done by Pakis, Filipinos and other third country nationals.
It may take the next few years to sort it out, but either these nations must control their subjects, or the West will have to destroy very large numbers of them. Exporting terrorism is not a nice thing to do. But the rulers don't see fit to be good international citizens.
This is not something we in the West want, but it will be forced upon us. When it comes it will not be pretty, but wars never are.
Just as with ANY of the world's under-developed regions, they are ONLY victims of their own inferior cultures, societies, belief systems (religion, economies-work ethic). I say "inferior" in terms of their ability to compete, and enjoy a "modern" standard of living.
Their religion is not a help; rather a hindrance. It guides them to act not according to reality.
Did not the Russians build the Aswan dam? Have not western firms exploited and processed the oil resources? What have all of the college grads from American and European schools done, when they returned? Truth is, many did NOT return. They saw a better way; a way not likely to occur in their lifetimes, back home.
Part I: The Next War, They Say
Part II: A Hand Grenade in Mid-Flight
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.