Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-Terror Laws To Increase Police Powers (Canada's example for us)
CBC ^ | 10-16-01

Posted on 10/16/2001 1:34:37 AM PDT by Ymani Cricket

Anti-terror laws to increase police powers

Last Updated: Tue Oct 16 02:08:44 2001

OTTAWA - The federal government has introduced new anti-terrorism legislation aimed at giving police more authority to crack down on terrorists and cut off fundraising for suspected terrorist groups.

Justice Minister Anne McLellan made the announcement on Monday in the House of Commons. The bill defines acts of terrorism domestically as those which threaten Canada's political institutions, the stability of the economy and the general welfare of the country.

McLellan said the bill had three main objectives:
suppress existing terrorist groups, provide police with new investigative tools, and toughen prison sentences for terrorists.

Some of the new measures:

"We believe that people everywhere are entitled to live in peace and security," McLellan said, adding it's up to the government to ensure that. "We've kept individual rights of Canadians in mind while developing this legislation," she said.

The Liberals hope that in light of the Sept. 11 terror attacks in the U.S., the legislation will be passed in as little as a month.

Representatives from the opposition parties were quick to react.

Canadian Alliance MP Vic Toews offered his party's full support to the government.

But he also criticized the Liberals for rejecting his party's earlier attempts to create this type of legislation, prior to the Sept. 11 terror attacks in the U.S.

PC-DR Coalition MP Peter MacKay gave tentative support to what he called "lofty, but extremely important" legislation.

"We look forward to working with the government and all parties," said MacKay.

Bloc Québécois MP Michel Bellehumeur says the party supports the new bill, and urged the government to make Canada an example to other nations by passing effective anti-terrorism legislation.

RELATED STORY: Critics say anti-terror bill goes too far

But New Democratic Party MP Bill Blaikie echoed leader Alexa McDonough's hesitation in offering blanket support for the bill.

Blaikie said the NDP wants to be sure that the right to peaceful dissent is not removed, or even limited.

He said the NDP will reserve final judgment until it gets input from various organizations across the country.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/16/2001 1:34:37 AM PDT by Ymani Cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ymani Cricket
and the general welfare of the country.

Thats pretty vague

Allow for the arrest of individuals without warrant if it's believed that would prevent terrorist activity

Who is to define what terrorist activity IS?

2 posted on 10/16/2001 1:37:31 AM PDT by Ymani Cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cool Guy
ping
3 posted on 10/16/2001 1:53:52 AM PDT by Ymani Cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ymani Cricket
Remember those protestors that got pepper sprayed by the RCMP? When all those world leaders met behind closed doors? Those people will be called terrorists.

I think you had one of those little scuffles in Seattle. Next time just call them terrorists and arrest the lot.

When they all meet outside Calgary next year again, and the protestors show up again, they will just be jailed, pre-emptively, of course. Ralph Klien won't have to deal with protestors marring his rubbing elbows with the elite in Kanaskis country.

Next time the nurses go out on an illegal strike, because it's been 5 or 10 years without a raise, they will be called terrorists.

But, the Canadian government writes lots and lots of laws. The funny part, is they don't put any funding behind it. All bark, but no money. This is all just a show for you, the American viewer. Thanks for tuning in.

May as well post this too.. You think American media is bad? Try finding just one article published after January 2001, that tells you where the current state of our new made-in-Canada gun control program is. A billion dollars or so spent, and not even half of the guns are registered. Those that registered, still haven't got their final paperwork back. The computer system is apparently not working well, and the program is understaffed.

A giant flop, but not a peep, a squeak from the media, or the government.

4 posted on 10/16/2001 2:40:29 AM PDT by oldcanuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oldcanuck
...and not even half of the guns are registered. Perhaps something for the politicians to think about. Seems the same thing happened in California with the "assault weapons" ban.

Boonie Rat

MACV SOCOM, PhuBai/Hue '65-'66

5 posted on 10/16/2001 4:13:23 AM PDT by Boonie Rat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ymani Cricket
Thanks for the ping. In the immediate futere this might, cross the southern border.
6 posted on 10/16/2001 4:16:00 PM PDT by Cool Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson