Posted on 10/15/2001 11:37:51 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
Lock and load now!
© 2001 David H. Hackworth
Shooting first and straight while on a battlefield or a security detail is a matter of life or death. That's why weapons training normally gets the highest priority in the U.S. military.
If you're slow on the draw, you're dead, and your side loses.
Just ask the Marine guard in Lebanon in 1983 who didn't shoot fast enough when a kamikaze driver rammed his terror truck through the gate. It took the leatherneck one full second to chamber a round, another second to flip his weapon off safety and fire. By that time, the truck had smacked into the Marine billet he was securing and exploded. The Rules of Engagement forbade this expert rifleman from being locked and loaded even though his unit was on high alert for just such an attack. And those two seconds he lost arming his weapon cost 241 American lives.
Lesson learned: An unloaded weapon is useless. A lesson we've unfortunately learned and re-learned the hard way over and over again.
Recently, the Navy dedicated a memorial to the sailors who were aboard the USS Cole when it was savaged last year by a terrorist attack in the port of Aden. But even though the members of the security detail on the Cole were at their posts on high alert in an extremely dangerous port where they'd already been warned that a terrorist attack was highly probable not one of their weapons had a round in the chamber. The security detail gave the small craft that almost sank the Cole and killed 17 sailors a big, friendly American wave and the terrorists waved back just before they rammed their human torpedo into the ship. Again, the Rules of Engagement stated no weapons would have a round in the chamber.
Not having a magazine in a weapon, even for a crackerjack marksman, adds at least two more seconds before he or she can get off a round. Four seconds is more than enough time to drive a 10,000-gallon gas tanker into a nuclear reactor, a high school, a chemical plant or some other tempting target.
Yet today, at virtually every U.S. military installation around the globe and now at most of our airports, which are secured by the Army National Guard the guys and gals manning the security details at exterior gates and other critical or sensitive areas, including ammo dumps and armories, are as impotent as the Marines were in Lebanon or the sailors in Yemen. They don't have a round in the chamber and, in most cases, they don't even have a magazine in their weapons. Yet America is at war, and we know that thousands of fanatics are out there ready to strike.
When I was a 15-year-old soldier in Italy right after World War II, I "walked my post in a military manner" with a loaded M-1 rifle. My sergeant, captain, colonel and general trusted me, along with thousands of other young soldiers, not to shoot myself or anyone else who didn't deserve shooting.
But somewhere along the way, that trust disappeared. In today's military, a leader makes one mistake and he or she is toast. So the brass do the big CYA thing to ensure that they don't get burned. As a result, uniformed MBA-types have made micromanagement a General Order. In a military where a soldier gets busted for drunken driving and his captain is threatened with relief, imagine what an accidental rifle discharge would bring.
Last week, in Germany, where some guards were ordered to tape their rifles' magazine wells for safety, four-star Gen. Montgomery C. Meigs actually charged his colonels with checking on the guards and reporting back to him. A job the corporal of the guard used to do when careers weren't at stake.
The other key factor in the mix is that the troops less the Marine Corps and special units such as the Rangers haven't been getting the training time they need on the firing range to be fully competent with their individual weapons. Even though there are millions of bucks for higher headquarters' simulation war-game playing for military planners and the brass, nowhere near enough money has been allocated for putting holes in targets.
Will it take another USS Cole disaster before we allow the troops to lock and load?
For Education And Discussion Only. Not For Commercial Use.
Stay well - stay safe - stay armed - Yorktown
Back in the '80, when I was assigned to the Security Department of a large Southern California Navy base, we patrolled the base with unloaded weapons. I can remember responding to an armed robbery of the base gas station, driving through traffic and loading my gun at the same time. The official procedure was to load the gun once you were on the scene, and then only when threatened. The hell with that!
By the way, this posture among guards in Beruit was not dreamt up by the local Commander of the Marine Task Force - It was directed by the Head of U.S. Forces in Europe (I think an Army General in Italy at the time) to whom the Marine Task Force reported.Nope,it was a civilian decision made by those elitist cowardly bastards in the US State Department. They are ALWAYS the people who make these decisions unless there is a actual war declared. Maybe even then,since they flat don't give a damn about American military people dying if it might make THEM "look bad" to the host gooberment.
I don't know to what extent either of these is true, probably both in the post-Vietnam era, but I also recall considerable pressure from the Democrat-controlled Congress od the time to make the Marines less "militaristic" in this deployment. I don't remember if it was by resolution, or public pressure on Reagan, but it was there.
Ain't that the truth. In 1970, while in Basic at Ft Campbell, I got 5 rounds in my ammo pouch for guarding the Navy installation (rumored to store nukes, but also regular ammo) inside the post. There were NO instructions as when to lock and load, much less fire.
At one Guard summer camp, my very worried captain told me he had to pick up $50,000 in cash for our payroll, and the supply depot wouldn't issue him any .45 ammo because it was "too much paperwork". So I drove in to town, and bought a box of buckshot at a hardware store, and carried a loaded riot gun while he had his empty .45
Basically, the US military does not trust its troops with loaded weapons, unless it's in a war zone, and everything is a free fire area. Safe gun handling is taught for a firing range, but not for anything in the real world, off the range. I knew more about firearms safety in the field from my hunter safety classes, taken when I was a kid, than from what the Army taught me.
"Elite" military forces get plenty of range time, and are also taught a lot more about safe gun handling. But for the other 99% of the military, all you're expected to know is "keep the muzzle pointed downrange" while at the firing range. That's because military thinking assumes the only time a troop needs to use a weapon is in a full-blown war with hordes of screaming gooks coming across the wire. That's why using our troops as guards for critical sites in this crisis is just a bad joke.
Hopefully the ones who can think are already considering a time-honored policy that actually *works*: "Beg forgiveness, not permission."
Can you say "Thank you,US State Department"?
Sad to say,but I think you are right for the most part. It still doesn't pay to screw around with the guys guarding access to briefing rooms,no matter what rank they OR you are. The people who pick these guards generally tend to pick the hardnoses,and these people WILL fire you up at the slightest provocation. If you ain't on the list,you don't get in. Period.
Guarded with an unloaded rifle.
Forget not having "one in the chamber...", he didn't have any ammunition on him either.
Yes. All image,no reality. They ain't even allowed to beat you with the club unless somebody's life is in immediate danger from you if they don't.
Even on the yearly trip to the range however, we were contantly being badgered with needless "safety" regulations. For example, on the range, we had to have flourescent "T-squares" in the chambers at all times. We were only allowed to remove them once we were in position to shoot. After we finished shooting that particular round, we had to immediately insert the T-squares back in. Also, we had to keep our rifles pointed downrange at all times (even with the T-square inserted). They were so ridiculous about this that as we walked onto and around the range, we had to rotate our bodies around the rifles so that they would always be pointed in the "downrange" direction. Any deviation from this would result in immediate ejection from the range and disciplinary action.
Now some here may say "what's the big deal with that." Well I'll tell you. It made us all paranoid. It didn't make us comfortable with the weapon at all. In a war situation or even a high alert situation, we need to be comfortable with toting around a loaded weapon. Flourescent T-squares aren't going to cut it on a battlefield.
Members of my Army Reserve unit told me that when they were activated for the King riots in Chicago, they didn't have any ammo issued. The person who told me this said that he did have ammo. It just wasn't issued.
Safety ON Finger OFF Trigger...
Safety OFF Finger ON Trigger...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.