Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allend
In your case, however, there is no point.

Well, we are developing a new threads doctrine here, we only have to repeat ourselves 2 or 3, (not determined yet)times and then we can simply say I handled this question already, let's move along now, because I will not go there again.

These threads should really get interesting when all we are allowed to respond to questions with, are new, never used before answers.

I can see where this will be to the advantage of the non's, since we aren't limited to Headquarters answers, but anything the Bible has to say on the subject. :-)

48 posted on 10/15/2001 10:40:02 AM PDT by JHavard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: JHavard
Well, we are developing a new threads doctrine here, we only have to repeat ourselves 2 or 3, (not determined yet)times and then we can simply say I handled this question already, let's move along now, because I will not go there again.

As long as we do it with panache, like Commons Question Time for the Prime Minister:

"I refer the right honourable gentleman to the answer I gave some moments ago."

SD

50 posted on 10/15/2001 10:50:23 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson