[hopefulpilgrim]

In #2476, you wrote:

I mentioned this [Acts 13:1-3] to call attention to the fact that Paul and Barnabus were not ordained by apostles, but bu the Church and it's people...There goes your idea that only the apostles could ordain ministers, and claim apostolic succession.

JHavard, did they ever actually deal with the passage itself that you referred them to, or did they ignore it and argue with you? Just curious, because I've noticed that they do this a lot.

[JHavard]

I mentioned this [Acts 13:1-3] to call attention to the fact that Paul and Barnabus were not ordained by apostles, but bu the Church and it's people...There goes your idea that only the apostles could ordain ministers, and claim apostolic succession.

JHavard, did they ever actually deal with the passage itself that you referred them to, or did they ignore it and argue with you? Just curious, because I've noticed that they do this a lot.

This scripture definitely blows a hole in their apostolic seccession, and shows that things were going to be done differently from then on, thanks for bringing it up again. (^g^)

[JHavard]

I mentioned this [Acts 13:1-3] to call attention to the fact that Paul and Barnabus were not ordained by apostles, but bu the Church and it's people...There goes your idea that only the apostles could ordain ministers, and claim apostolic succession.

JHavard, did they ever actually deal with the passage itself that you referred them to, or did they ignore it and argue with you? Just curious, because I've noticed that they do this a lot.

This scripture definitely blows a hole in their apostolic seccession, and shows that things were going to be done differently from then on, thanks for bringing it up again. (^g^)