To: SoothingDave
I don't appreciate being told I'm "misrepresenting" things. Prove it.
How many definitions of Sola Scriptura have you seen? Did you not post a pretty decent one yourself? Do you disagree with St. Augustine? Dou you choose one definition which you can attack?
MISREPRESENTATION - DELIBERATE MISREPRESENTATION
To: OLD REGGIE
Lurker jumping in for a second. Mr. Old Reggie you say Mr. Soothing Dave is misrepresenting Sola Scriptura because the definition is 'scripture is paramount' not 'scripture is exclusive' But when Mr. SD uses a bible quote and historical records to help interpret, he is lambasted for being extra-biblical in his interpretation. If scripture is paramount; the use of history, context, language, to interpret should be acceptable under Sola Scriptura as long as the interpretation is not contrary to other parts of the bible. consistency in definition and application is needed on both sides. Lurker fading back into the backgroung...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson