Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allend
The complete Latin translation is very old, and is dated by some scholars at ca. 200 A.D. Even without that, Irenaeus' works can be reconstructed almost entirely from ancient fragments. Your attempt to deny the reality of history by sneering at "barbarous Latin," is just dumb.


Please show me where I can find it saying the Latin translations were made around 200AD, and please simply Copy and Paste the claim, and don't give me three days of reading to find it my self. "Just the facts Ma'am"

Where do you get this nonsense. If you say we have a 300-year gap, then to be consistent you must say there is no such thing as history prior to 300 A.D. Just goes to show that your doctines must rely on ignorance.


Where do I get this nonsence? Well it could be from the fact you have nothing solid to base your beliefs on from the death of the apostles until you became the history your self in the 3rd century, and then tried to build the bridge back to the apostles, instead of building it from the apostles forward using canon scripture.

The Temple of God is now in man, it is a spiritual state, how did you round up all those spirits, and put them in your church? Lol :-)

21 posted on 10/15/2001 8:19:06 AM PDT by JHavard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson