Skip to comments.
ACCIDENTAL TIMING
http://www.law.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/AppLogic+FTContentServer?pagename=law/View&c=Article&cid=ZZZL8I54PSC&live=true&cst=6&pc=0&pa=0&s=News&ExpIgnore=true&showsummary=0 ^
Posted on 10/14/2001 4:45:07 PM PDT by Zoey
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Letters to the editor challenging the accuracy of Kaplan's account of two of the justices' remarks appeared last week in both Newsweek and The Washington Post Are the democraps making sh*t up now?
1
posted on
10/14/2001 4:45:07 PM PDT
by
Zoey
To: Zoey
Of what importance is the truth to a Deomocrat, after all they believe that government officials while under oath and in court are entitled to lie( at least if they happen to be democrats).
To: Zoey; Romulus
Neither have responded yetIsn't 'neither' singular?
To: Zoey
"...Are the democraps making sh*t up now?..." A democrat is lying even when they use words like: 'a', 'the' and 'or'.
The only truth that ever comes out of a democrats mouth is the occasional bit needed to cement two lies together, end to end.
The bastards just got caught doing it a little more artlessly this time.
4
posted on
10/14/2001 4:54:00 PM PDT
by
DWSUWF
To: Zoey
My question is this:
Why don't the Justices come out and say whether or not they said anything or not?
I don't understand their silence in this.
To: Zoey
I call it Newspeak magazine and I don't generally read it anymore. Stick with You Snooze and World Retorts.
To: DWSUWF
You don't understand their silence??? It seems to me they followed Momma's advice:
Don't enter a debate with pathological liars.
7
posted on
10/14/2001 5:02:23 PM PDT
by
Dogbert41
To: aposiopetic
yes
8
posted on
10/14/2001 5:04:35 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: Zoey
Think Bernard Kalb has written a book about the vast right wing conspiracy out to get clinton during the monica scandals......how funny are these moroons.........
9
posted on
10/14/2001 5:06:16 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
To: Zoey
Everyone lies about............... ummmm............................... elections.
To: Dogbert41
Don't enter a debate with pathological liars. And a hell of a lot of the reports in both the Washington Post and Newsweek are pure lies.
One can not win an argument with a lying media. They own the paper and the magazine. They always get the last word and can distort any thing a justice might say.
If fact if a Justice were to talk to them, they would just lie about what the Justice said.
To: aposiopetic
No, it's plural as in "neither [of the two] have responded" - the subject's number is understood by the meaning of the word "neither" itself.
12
posted on
10/14/2001 5:14:13 PM PDT
by
Anochka
To: Anochka
Just think what his sequel will be on the New York's Mayors race in the Democratic primary
13
posted on
10/14/2001 5:29:59 PM PDT
by
meenie
To: Anochka
If you expand it to say "Neither of the two has responded," you still have a singular subject, followed by a modifying phrase, which therefore calls for a singular verb, since the verb always refers back to the subject. You might think of it as "Neither one of the two judges has responded."
14
posted on
10/14/2001 5:31:00 PM PDT
by
Cicero
To: Zoey
Are the democraps making sh*t up now?Whaddya mean, "now"??
To: 1rudeboy; Anochka; Cicero; Romulus
I agree with Cicero's explanation and 1rudeboy's conclusion. I trust that the other esteemed Roman will correct me if I am wrong; certainly he will recall my outspoken criticism of a rather cumbersome diatribe written by Ann Coulter a few months ago.
To: Zoey
"...he declined to discuss his confidential sources or the fact-checking done afterward. If he spells out who he did or did not talk to, Kaplan explained, his sources could be discovered eventually by process of elimination."
You can print anything you want as long as you do not have to provide the source. Doesn't mean we have to believe them.
Remember, the "media" is not our friend.
;-}
To: Gordian Blade
Stick with You Snooze and World Retorts. I guess I've been pronouncing it wrong. I always called it "U.S. Screws The World Report".
Actually, I think all three of the major newsmagazines are (1) too liberal, and (2) of such poor quality, that I won't read them even in a doctor's waiting room. Fortunately, Internet news sources have rendered them completely unnecessary for anyone who's connected.
To: Zoey
Naw, the Democrats wouldn't do that!
To: aposiopetic
You have the same problem with "none." None have sounds correct, but "none" is is the the proper formulation. Of course, times change . . . .
20
posted on
10/14/2001 5:54:36 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson