Posted on 10/13/2001 5:02:03 PM PDT by Diogenesis
Iraq 'behind US anthrax outbreaks'
David Rose and Ed Vulliamy, New York
Sunday October 14, 2001
The Observer
American investigators probing anthrax outbreaks in
Florida and New York believe they have all the
hallmarks of a terrorist attack - and have named Iraq
as prime suspect as the source of the deadly spores.
Their inquiries are adding to what US hawks say is a
growing mass of evidence that Saddam Hussein was
involved, possibly indirectly, with the 11 September
hijackers.
If investigators' fears are confirmed - and sceptics
fear American hawks could be publicising the claim to
press their case for strikes against Iraq - the pressure
now building among senior Pentagon and White
House officials in Washington for an attack may
become irresistible.
Plans have been discussed among Pentagon
strategists for US air strike support for armed
insurrections against Saddam by rebel Kurds in the
north and Shia Muslims in the south with a promise of
American ground troops to protect the oilfields of
Basra.
Contact has already been made with an Iraqi
opposition group based in London with a view to
installing its members as a future government in
Baghdad.
Leading US intelligence sources, involved with both
the CIA and the Defence Department, told The
Observer that the 'giveaway' which suggests a state
sponsor for the anthrax cases is that the victims in
Florida were afflicted with the airborne form of the
disease.
'Making anthrax, on its own, isn't so difficult,' one
senior US intelligence source said. 'But it only begins
to become effective as a biological weapon if they
can be made the right size to breathe in. If you can't
get airborne infectivity, you can't use it as a weapon.
That is extremely difficult. There is very little leeway.
Most spores are either too big to be suspended in air,
or too small to lodge on the lining of the lungs.'
As claims about an Iraqi link grew, senior health
officials in Britain revealed they warned all the
country's GPs last week to be vigilant about the
disease. 'I think we have to be prepared to think the
unthinkable,' said the Government's Chief Medical
Officer, Dr Liam Donaldson. The Department of
Health confirmed the Government is conducting an
urgent review of Britain's ability to cope with chemical
or biological attacks.
US intelligence believes Iraq has the technology and
supplies of anthrax suitable for terrorist use. 'They
aren't making this stuff in caves in Afghanistan,' the
CIA source said. 'This is prima facie evidence of the
involvement of a state intelligence agency. Maybe Iran
has the capability. But it doesn't look likely politically.
That leaves Iraq.'
Last autumn Mohamed Atta is said by US intelligence
officials to have met in Prague an agent from Iraqi
intelligence called Ahmed Samir al-Ahani, a former
consul later expelled by the Czechs for activities not
compatible with his diplomatic mission.
The Czechs are also examining the possibility that
Atta met a former director of Saddam's external
secret services, Farouk Hijazi, at a second meeting in
the spring. Hijazi is known to have met Bin Laden.
It was confirmed yesterday that Jim Woolsey, CIA
director from 1993 to 1996, recently visited London on
behalf of the hawkish Defence Department to 'firm up'
other evidence of Iraqi involvement in 11 September.
Hawkish? Is there another type of Defence Department?
Of couse there is: the Kumbaya/Clintonista/meals-on-wheels/NWO-peacekeeper kind!
To find all articles tagged or indexed using
Anthrax_Scare_List
Go here:
and then click the Anthrax_Scare_List topic to initiate the search! !
2) Announce a 'sufficient time' emergency-pace evacuation window, with an unknown (but pre-planned and absolutely firm) zero time.
3) Use a strategic hydrogen weapon with a yield and detonation altitude selected to leave nothing remaining. (The less left along the lines of the sappy Hiroshima 'shrines', the better.)
4) Install a responsible government, made up of Iraqi nationals. (from their government in exile perhaps)
Repeatedly stress the point that, aside from certain high ranking war criminals, (Saddam, et al) that no one has to die.
Baghdad, their ‘leaders’ and their ‘government’ are forfeit, but any additional casualties are at their own hands, and on their own heads.
Then on to Syria!
2) Announce a 'sufficient time' emergency-pace evacuation window, with an unknown (but pre-planned and absolutely firm) zero time.
3) Use a strategic hydrogen weapon with a yield and detonation altitude selected to leave nothing remaining. (The less left along the lines of the sappy Hiroshima 'shrines', the better.)
4) Install a responsible government, made up of Iraqi nationals. (from their government in exile perhaps)
Repeatedly stress the point that, aside from certain high ranking war criminals, (Saddam, et al) that no one has to die.
Baghdad, their ‘leaders’ and their ‘government’ are forfeit, but any additional casualties are at their own hands, and on their own heads.
Then on to Syria!
*wink*
We are at war. War time decisions are not equivalent to court case evidentiary proceedings.
If Saddam is at all linked to the anthrax mailings, he's toast.
Valid point!
I'm not for sale, but who the hell am I?
Saddam is not the sharpest knife in the kitchen, but I doubt that any of his anthrax could get away without his knowledge.
OK
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.