Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An Angry Bush Trying to Plug Leaks to Media
CNN.Com ^ | October 8, 2001 | John King

Posted on 10/08/2001 8:48:20 PM PDT by ClancyJ

Edited on 04/29/2004 1:59:09 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last
To: ClancyJ
Information about ongoing or proposed military operations should not even be given to the the four congessional leaders mentioned by Bush. Congress knows what the overall mission is; that's all they need to know. Like another posted mentioned; if there is not both the appropriate security clearance and an absolute need to know, that person should be kept ot of the loop.
61 posted on 10/08/2001 9:43:41 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
it's not a revised list - one is the house, the other is the senate
62 posted on 10/08/2001 9:44:46 PM PDT by AntiScumbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: AntiScumbag
ROFLOL! WELL? That's ONE way to keep your mouth shut. LOL!

Graham, Levin, Edwards and Hatch have been on every talk show one could possibly make in a week.

Check out the REVISED list by Howlin post #49. I think they're all alive. LOL! Physically, that is.

63 posted on 10/08/2001 9:44:51 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: kcvl, Howlin
How many in on that briefing identify with the peaceniks? They will justify their lack of trustworthiness as preventing innocents from being killed.

I feel sure the Bush White House will investigate the source of leaks. There are many ways to make it very unprofitable for them.

I expect that if there are future leaks - there will no longer be briefings before an action. That is the next step and when pressed as to why the public is not informed, they will advise why.

64 posted on 10/08/2001 9:47:37 PM PDT by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: AntiScumbag
Thanks. That was still an old 1998 list.
65 posted on 10/08/2001 9:48:20 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: LUVYA DUBYA 2000
Hatch.
66 posted on 10/08/2001 9:50:04 PM PDT by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AntiScumbag
norm is the only one on the list i'm absolutely, positively sure isn't leaking but, that's only because he's dead

Did you see the movie Major League. As the owner said, when one of the board of directors pointed out that one of the players she intended to hire was dead,

WELL, MARK HIM OFF THE LIST.

67 posted on 10/08/2001 9:51:00 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ
Unbelievable that some ELECTED nitwit put the lives of Americans at risk!
68 posted on 10/08/2001 9:52:37 PM PDT by WaterDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Shillary must be shooting off her mouth again.
69 posted on 10/08/2001 9:52:56 PM PDT by GailA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: PRND21
I thought Hatch right off the bat but Rumsfeld reprimanded him severely after the last leak. So, WHO IS IT? Curious minds want to know!!!!
70 posted on 10/08/2001 10:14:06 PM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ
I wrote the Pelosi woman an email to remind her that the American people are firmly on board with the President's policies without needing to be informed of every little detail and if over 90% can see the need to keep information secret, so can she.

sf.nancy@mail.house.gov
71 posted on 10/08/2001 10:21:42 PM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ
Step 1: Replace all Clinton hirees.

Step 2: Ensure conservative GenX replacements. They run quiet and smooth, and won't snag on pretty offers. We've seen 'em before, they're bunk.
72 posted on 10/08/2001 10:25:05 PM PDT by Maelstrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texlok
He needs to release differing stories to members of congress and then whichever story gets leaked to the media, he knows who it is and should out them.

Exactly -- this is an age-old technique for uncovering rats.

73 posted on 10/08/2001 10:27:58 PM PDT by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
Exactly -- this is an age-old technique for uncovering rats.

That, and free cheese.

74 posted on 10/08/2001 10:44:29 PM PDT by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ
I have plenty of ideas - possibly one junior senator who is married to a very interested party

SENATOR HILLARY CLINTON IS A SECURITY THREAT TO THIS NATION.

75 posted on 10/08/2001 10:54:57 PM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Maelstrom
Exactly.
76 posted on 10/08/2001 10:57:28 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you. ;)

Just looking for people having classified information. Good luck.

77 posted on 10/09/2001 10:14:45 AM PDT by Judge Parker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ
I am so loving our gutsy President. I expect the Leaker is more than a little worried about his/her pet projects, future invitations to the White House not to mention the possibility of no more face time as a talking head or even re-election. heeheehee Good. I hope they can't sleep at night.
78 posted on 10/09/2001 10:54:23 AM PDT by Darlin'
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darlin'
Yes, we are seeing that steely resolve Barbara Bush gave this son.

Let's watch all the media and the enemies of the U.S. in congress now come forth with good reasons that they need to have access to this confidential information. Although leaks and deaths to our soldiers, they will show that they need to know. Of course, they need to know - how else to forewarn bin Laden?

This is cramping the style of our media. How hard to be first with the news -irregardless of the effect on our soldiers and our objectives - when you have been declared a security risk.

I love it! The press conference reflected all of their pompous indigation at having their links shut off. Now they will indicate the president seeks to run the government without oversight. They are such pompous, unpatriotic fools.

79 posted on 10/09/2001 11:26:39 AM PDT by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson