I distinctly recall, in my '83 high school biology class, the text book stating "there are two theories of how life was formed". It then went on to give two sentences about creation, then immediately went into evolution theory.
I'm hearing more and more now from evolutionists, that evolution doesn't claim to know how life was formed. IMHO, that is because they realized they couldn't answer that question, so they branched it. Could it also be because many scientists who studied evolution became "believers"? Of course, those that did, are no longer in the "loop" are they? They were only legitimate when they were evolution "believers".
I seriously doubt that you will find any true scientists who intellectually support creationism. It takes a pretty big leap to believe that there is this all powerful being who just happened one day to think it was a good idea to "create" earth and man; and then sits back and watches us suffer and struggle. People have faith in whatever makes then feel good. Science is a different story.
Richard W.