Something is fishy here. I didn't even think there was $300 trillion in measurable "wealth" in the world today, yet some group of people is supposed to have this much money?
And if their goal is to collapse the U.S. economy and everything that goes with it, doesn't it make sense that their $300 trillion in assets is going to disappear when these assets lose all of their value?
"We have $300 trillion in assets, including real estate and securities all over the world. We are going to collapse the world's economy so that we can become the new world leaders."
OK, pal. So when the economy of the world collapses and you try to liquidate your "wealth," how much do you think you are going to get for it?
"About $17.38, I would say."
I see. Sounds like a great career move to me. But I must admit that it takes some brains to convince a bunch of guys to kill themselves in a series of terrorist attacks just so you can devalue your own wealth from $300 trillion to $17.38.
Let's see . . . Suppose Bill Gates is worth $50 billion. Then 20 Bill Gates would have $1 Trillion. Therefore she's talking about 300 times 20 Bill Gates, or 6,000 Bill Gates . . . hmmm
On the other hand there may be a mis-translation of the word "trillion." I think the French word for our word "million" is "billion." If you take this up a notch she might mean an American billion when she says trillion.
Then this rich group would equal only 6 Bill Gates, not 6,000 . . . .
OTOH, this might all be 100% pure BS, which is where I am leaning . . .