Posted on 10/04/2001 1:12:16 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Sunday's Orlando Sentinel brought the news Cuban- Americans have been expecting. A group of 16 organizations have questioned if Cuba should be on the U.S. State Department's list of terrorist-supporting nations. It was only a matter of time.
The tragedy of Sept. 11 was unprecedented and paralyzing, especially for someone like me, who cherishes the freedom this country so graciously provided some 40 years ago. I stand united.
Yet I cannot help but remember thousands killed by terrorists in the past 20 years in Northern Ireland, or by car bombs in Colombia and Spain, as well as those killed in the 1950s by Fidel Castro's "urban guerrillas." Some people would classify those terrorists as "freedom fighters." Funny. That's what some people call Osama bin Laden.
The fact that Cuba has been -- and most likely still is -- a safe haven and training ground for the FARC, ETA and IRA "freedom fighters," or that just a few months ago Castro was the only "president" who didn't sign a document denouncing the ETA and its terrorism, does not make a difference to the 16 distinguished organizations looking to support him.
The fact that Castro has harbored, and still harbors, individuals who have committed acts of terrorism in this country is irrelevant. Rep. Maxine Waters and others may romanticize them as " '60s radicals," but they committed despicable acts just the same.
Even the fact that Castro despises us as much as bin Laden does -- that he indoctrinates his children against "the enemy to the north" -- is also, apparently, irrelevant.
These organizations should open their eyes.
In the following weeks we will see the "pacifists" emerge from their caves. We already saw some of them in Washington last Sunday. It is just a matter of time before the Rangels, Serranos and Dodds resurface, locking arms with Rep. Barbara Lee, who recently cast that sole dissenting vote against President George W. Bush.
But we Cuban-Americans -- and these days, there's an emphasis on Americans -- who the press favors calling "extremist" and "reactionary" will remain on watch in Orlando, New York, New Jersey, Tampa and, of course, South Florida. And we will continue to denounce the hypocrites, the apologists and the cave-dwellers.
Manuel J. Coto is a medical doctor who lives in Orlando. Copyright © 2001, Orlando Sentinel
Given the vagaries of the human mind, I can offer no single explanation. I can recall that similar attributes during the century of the dictator were attributed to all the century's dictators, even Hitler for a time. One other point: these are the attributes progressives never detect in, say, a George W. Bush or a Ronald Reagan. At home they find them in Kennedys, Clintons, and other dynamic Democrats. It makes you wonder, does it not? [End Excerpt]
Why the Double Standard for Castro?-- [Excerpt] Thanks to communism, Cuba - once one of the wealthiest Caribbean countries - is now one of its poorest. Cuban society is ruthlessly regimented by a police state modeled on those of Stalin and Mao. Much of the Cuban population has been forced to flee in successive expulsions since the 1960s.
The response proposed by American liberals? The United States should be nicer to Fidel Castro. Today almost all liberal politicians, pundits and journalists, joined by many in the American business community, claim that ending U.S. economic sanctions on Cuba will promote political freedom and ultimately democracy in Castro's bankrupt police state.
Curiously, the American left made the opposite claim in the 1980s, when it backed the economic sanctions that played a role in ending apartheid in South Africa. And few liberals show interest in easing sanctions on Saddam Hussein's Iraq. [End Excerpt]
Although several countries -- Iraq, Syria, North Korea, Cuba and Libya among them -- were said to be harboring thousands of members of these shadowy networks, Secretary of State Colin Powell said Washington was broadening its investigations into their financial sources.
Facing an enemy operating in 60 countries, including in Europe and the United States, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said troops would not be engaged in a conventional war.
How much more evidence do you need?
Background on Arrest of Castro's Pentagon Spy --One is that she could leak relevant information about our intended response to the terrorist attacks to the Cubans, who in turn could pass it on to bin Laden. The other is that there was a turf battle inside the administration between the Bush Justice Department and leftover elements from the Clinton administration at the Pentagon on how to deal with Cuba.
We need to find all these traitors in our government. She was feeding Castro intelligence and advising us on Castro, and guess what? She saw no threat!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.