Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoothingDave
Will you affirm for me that the Catholic Church did not translate the Bible into Latin as a dead language, but raher as the common tongue of those who could read in the Western Empire?

Reasonable enough. Of course it gets troubling later on when they don't want any new translations despite the fact that Latin was no longer the "common tongue."

164 posted on 10/03/2001 10:14:47 AM PDT by the808bass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]


To: the808bass
Reasonable enough. Of course it gets troubling later on when they don't want any new translations despite the fact that Latin was no longer the "common tongue."

Thank you. If you go back far enough, I even mentioned this and deliberately separated the Church's sluggishness to abandon Latin in favor of modern tongues. But for the purposes here, I was strictly referring to the Church's motive in creating a Latin Bible.

SD

165 posted on 10/03/2001 10:17:33 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson