[Doctor Stochastic]

As idiotic as her column was, firing seems extreme. Especially under the circumstances. Of course, I don't know other details in her relationship with NROL.

[Alberta's Child]

National Review never struck me as the kind of place for people who are not staid, middle-aged men. I guess Jonah "Girly-Boy" Goldberg is probably the next to go.

[Timesink]

As idiotic as her column was, firing seems extreme. Especially under the circumstances.

Something tells me I wouldn't have a job tomorrow either if I went on national television tonight and called my bosses "spineless girly-boys."

[mercy]

NOW you say idiotic. Shortly you will admit, prophetic.

[7thson]

Today is the first day I have heard about her being fired from NR. How ironic! I see conservative pundits on TV stating that Bill Maher should not be fired or punished for his remarks and yet Ann Coulter gets canned. What a bunch of dummies. Reminds me when Samual Francis' column was booted out of the Washington Times several years back. And what's with these people at NR anyway. Did Ann just happen to sneak her column past the editors? Did any editor see the column beforehand and say 'hey - this seems a little harsh.' No - they probably liked it and now are unwilling to take the heat. Spineless!

[TN Republican]

NR doesn't need her or her bony legs.