Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trad_anglican
From Thread 150:

Surely he would have been aware of such a broad evolution in understanding of the very basic, the defining event in the history of his religion, and would have taken steps to ensure that his story was correctly understood.

Really? What steps might those have been? Please tell me how an author can assure that someone does not misunderstand or misinterpret what he writes. I might be able to use it with allend.

4 posted on 09/29/2001 8:12:19 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: angelo
Really? What steps might those have been?

He would either have omitted the midrash altogether, or made it clear that it was not to be taken literally.

70 posted on 10/01/2001 6:15:53 AM PDT by trad_anglican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: angelo;trad_anglican
Surely he would have been aware of such a broad evolution in understanding of the very basic, the defining event in the history of his religion, and would have taken steps to ensure that his story was correctly understood.

Really? What steps might those have been? Please tell me how an author can assure that someone does not misunderstand or misinterpret what he writes. I might be able to use it with allend.

Well, the author can remain alive and tell everybody what he meant when they misinterpret it. But that only works for so long.

I guess that the author (in this case ultimately, God) could do the analogous thing. And set up an organization to explain the written word. To judge its meaning. And, being God, He would protect this organization from teaching wrongly.

Voila!

SD

79 posted on 10/01/2001 7:08:44 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson