How honest are you being here? If your objections to evolution are at bottom scientifically motivated, I'm Queen Victoria. People don't bend over backwards for nothing.
I'm being completely honest. My motivation is scientific, not religious, unlike yours. You tried to bring various religious aspects (e.g. Genesis) into this debate at least twice, not me.
I cited facts, not supposition, unlike your posts. The difference is clear, my opposition to Evolution stems from its scientific weaknesses. It fails against Complexity Theory. It fails against Chaos Theory. It fails against Intelligent Design Theory. It even fails to explain the very FIRST step in its own evolutionary process, that of abiogenesis.
But feel free to continue to have religious faith in Evolutionary Theory, just don't try to call such non-fact-based reasoning "science."